Products
Solar
Best solar companies California Embr Home
Clovis, CA. This profile is built from public installation records and published ratings, not paid placement.
Solar.com Installer Score
6.9/10
Synthesized from 97 published customer reviews.
Updated September 12, 2026 · No installer can pay to change this score · How scores work →
32 reviews speak to this · 29 praise · 3 complaints
10 reviews speak to this · 6 praise · 4 complaints
20 reviews speak to this · 17 praise · 3 complaints
12 reviews speak to this · 10 praise · 2 complaints
25 reviews speak to this · 22 praise · 3 complaints
18 reviews speak to this · 18 praise · 0 complaints
Why this differs from star ratings: most five-star reviews say “great company” and stop, and star averages reward that. These category scores only count reviews with concrete evidence, weighted by recency and the reviewer’s track record. A company can hold a strong star average while specific categories score lower; that gap is usually where the real story is. Categories with more complaints than praise are the questions worth asking any bidder, not necessarily dealbreakers.
What this data covers: *Counts on this page, including the totals up top, come from investor-owned-utility interconnection records (SCE, SDG&E, PG&E). Work in municipal-utility territory, such as LADWP or city utilities, and outside California does not appear here, so this company's true totals are higher than shown. Unlike the county rankings, this profile also shows counties below the 250-install ranking floor.
| County | Verified installs | Recent 2025-26 | Active since | Median system | % leased | County rankingLink to the county ranking page. This company's rank on this page is its Solar.com Installer Score rank, shown above. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fresno County | 62 | 62 | 2025 | 7.9 kW | 0.0% | below ranking floor (under 250 installs) |
| San Bernardino County | 13 | 13 | 2026 | 8.7 kW | 0.0% | below ranking floor (under 250 installs) |
% leased counts systems recorded as third party owned (lease or power purchase agreement); the remainder are customer owned. Median system size is the middle system this company installed in that county. Star ratings and review counts are from Google.
Solar
California. Note: the install counts on this page cover California investor-owned-utility records only.
Work for this company or see something out of date? Profiles can be claimed and corrected: contact partners@solar.com. Placement on solar.com is never for sale.
Important context: this chart shows investor-owned-utility records only. Companies that shift work toward municipal-utility territory (LADWP and city power departments) or other states will show declining bars here even while building steadily elsewhere, and 2025-26 records also lag real installation dates. Treat this as a partial window, not the company's full trajectory.
We analyzed 91 published customer reviews of Embr Home in full. The company's Solar.com Installer Score is 6.9/10, with category-level detail on this page covering sales integrity, price transparency, communication, timeline reliability, workmanship, and long-term support.
Embr Home appears as installer of record on 75+ residential systems in California investor-owned-utility interconnection records through May 2026. Work in municipal-utility territory or other states does not appear in those public records.
Run your address through solar.com to see direct bids from vetted installers competing for your project, with pricing locked online. If you have a qualified quote from any installer, our Best Price Guarantee means we match better qualified prices.
Run your address and see direct pricing in about two minutes. No sales call required.
Methodology: Counts are residential PV interconnections in investor-owned-utility territory (PG&E, SCE, SDG&E) per CPUC Rule 21 public records through May 2026. Postal and name variants are merged. Municipal utility territory such as LADWP, Glendale, Pasadena, Burbank, Anaheim, and Riverside Public Utilities is not included in those CPUC counts. Counts show recorded installations, not quality ratings. Reported costs are self-reported on owned-system interconnections. No installer can pay for placement.