Best solar companies California Le Homes

Le Homes Reviews

Based in Woodlake, CA. This profile is built from public installation records and published ratings, not paid placement.

296verified installs in California utility records*
64recent installs, 2025-26 records*
2022first year in county records
7.7/10Solar.com Score · 63 reviews analyzed

Solar.com Installer Score for Le Homes

One score, computed the same way for every installer. We read the full text of all 63 substantive published Le Homes review texts across every platform and measure what customers actually report. Not a survey. Not a sample. Never for sale.

Solar.com Installer Score

7.7/10

Blends the six category scores (70%) with the recency-weighted star record (30%).

Synthesized from 63 substantive customer review texts (71 published reviews collected).

Google 4.9★ · 65 reviewsYelp 1.7★ · 6 reviews

Updated September 28, 2026 · No installer can pay to change this score · How scores work →

Read what customers actually say ↓
Review star recordRecency-weighted star ratings across platforms, converted to a 0-10 signal before it is blended into the headline Solar.com Score.9.8

recency-weighted star ratings across platforms

Sales IntegrityHow clearly and honestly the company explains the system, contract, savings, and incentives before you sign.6.4

11 reviews speak to this · 8 praise · 3 complaints

Price TransparencyHow well the final price, financing terms, and incentive guidance match what customers were led to expect.5.7

4 reviews speak to this · 0 praise · 4 complaints

CommunicationHow reliably the company keeps customers informed and answers questions across sales, installation, and service.6.7

12 reviews speak to this · 10 praise · 2 complaints

Timeline ReliabilityHow well the company manages the path from contract through permits, installation, inspection, and turn-on — without the customer having to chase it.7.0

15 reviews speak to this · 13 praise · 2 complaints

WorkmanshipThe quality, professionalism, neatness, and property care of the physical installation.7.4

15 reviews speak to this · 15 praise · 0 complaints

Long-Term SupportHow well the system performs after turn-on, how the company handles monitoring, warranty claims, and service calls — and its staying power to honor them.7.5

7 reviews speak to this · 5 praise · 2 complaints

#461 of 678 scored in California by Solar.com Installer Score

How does Le Homes compare where you live? Rankings are local; an installer that leads one city can trail in the next. See how they rank in your city →

Why this differs from star ratings: most five-star reviews say “great company” and stop, and star averages reward that. These category scores only count reviews with concrete evidence, weighted by recency and the reviewer’s track record. A company can hold a strong star average while specific categories score lower; that gap is usually where the real story is. Categories with more complaints than praise are the questions worth asking any bidder, not necessarily dealbreakers.

Where Solar.com fits in

We score the installers. Then they compete for your roof.

Solar.com vets and scores every installer from public records and published reviews — then licensed installers bid on your actual roof. Real prices online, backed by the Best Price Guarantee. No sales calls, no pressure — you pick the winner.

See my price

Where Le Homes builds

County-by-county activity from CPUC records through May 2026.

What this data covers: *Counts on this page, including the totals up top, come from investor-owned-utility interconnection records (SCE, SDG&E, PG&E). Work in municipal-utility territory, such as LADWP or city utilities, and outside California does not appear here, so this company's true totals are higher than shown. Unlike the county rankings, this profile also shows counties below the 250-install ranking floor.

CountyVerified installsRecent 2025-26Active sinceMedian system% leasedCounty rankingLink to the county ranking page. This company's rank on this page is its Solar.com Installer Score rank, shown above.
Fresno County1112620226.3 kW0.0%below ranking floor (under 250 installs)
Tulare County71620226.3 kW1.4%below ranking floor (under 250 installs)
Kern County32320225.4 kW0.0%below ranking floor (under 250 installs)
Kings County31320226.2 kW0.0%below ranking floor (under 250 installs)
Monterey County251320235.0 kW8.0%below ranking floor (under 250 installs)
Madera County13820227.4 kW0.0%below ranking floor (under 250 installs)
Merced County13520227.0 kW7.7%below ranking floor (under 250 installs)

% leased counts systems recorded as third party owned (lease or power purchase agreement); the remainder are customer owned. Median system size is the middle system this company installed in that county. Star ratings and review counts are from Google.

Le Homes reviews: what customers say

An independent synthesis of published customer feedback across Google and Yelp, updated September 23, 2026. Green marks praise, amber mixed experiences, red complaints.

Sales & proposal integrity

Sales Integrity6.4/10

Reviewers give LE HOMES a mixed-to-positive read on sales and proposal integrity. Many describe clear explanations and straightforward pricing, but a smaller set report confusing or concerning sales interactions and expectations that did not line up with what they understood at the start.Solar.com's composite of published customer feedback, not a customer quote

Clear explanations from sales. Several reviewers say the sales process was clearly explained and the pricing was presented honestly, with some describing a smooth start to the project. Representative review excerpt: "The application and the way they explained everything to me, including how to work with the LE Homes solar family, were all very clear."

Honest pricing and recommendations. Reviewers also describe honest recommendations and clear pricing, which suggests the company earns trust when proposals are laid out plainly. Representative review excerpt: "The company provided honest recommendations and clear pricing."

Sales concerns from a minority of reviews. A smaller group report sales interactions that felt misleading or inconsistent with what they expected, including concerns about how offers were presented and what was promised. Representative review excerpt: "Sales rep misrepresented himself as a PG&E employee stating since we are low income we get weather stripping and refrigerator."

Price & financing transparency

Price Transparency5.7/10

Feedback on price and financing transparency is mostly negative in the available evidence. The complaints focus on money handling, billing expectations, and timing around inspections or project completion, rather than on clear satisfaction with pricing details.Solar.com's composite of published customer feedback, not a customer quote

Money and billing complaints. Reviewers describe problems after payment, including reports of unfinished work or systems that were not operating as expected after money changed hands. Representative review excerpt: "They took my money and left me with non-working solar panels and battery."

Billing expectations not aligned. Some reviewers say the financial side became confusing once the project was underway, including unexpected payment pressure tied to the solar bill. Representative review excerpt: "Now I get phone call after complaints that refrigerator is available for delivery but I have to pay solar bill so it's not from electric company."

Inspection timing concerns. One reviewer links financing frustration to a project that moved ahead quickly but then stalled while waiting for inspection, which added to the sense of poor transparency around the final process. Representative review excerpt: "They were really quick to install, but since then, I have been waiting for the inspection."

Communication & coordination

Communication6.7/10

Communication and coordination are described more often positively than negatively, with reviewers frequently mentioning organized teams and clear explanations. Still, a few reviews say follow-up broke down, including difficulty getting responses after reaching out for help.Solar.com's composite of published customer feedback, not a customer quote

Organized and responsive teams. Reviewers often describe the team as punctual, organized, and professional, with projects handled smoothly from consultation through installation. Representative review excerpt: "The team was punctual and very organized."

Clear customer guidance. Several reviewers say the company explained the process clearly and provided helpful customer service during the project. Representative review excerpt: "The application and the way they explained everything to me, including how to work with the LE Homes solar family, were all very clear."

Some follow-up breakdowns. A smaller set report delayed or absent responses after leaving messages or contacting staff about unresolved issues. Representative review excerpt: "After leaving many messages, no one has answered or called back."

Timeline reliability

Timeline Reliability7.0/10

Timeline reliability trends positive overall, with multiple reviewers saying work finished on schedule or moved forward smoothly. The main complaint pattern is delay after installation, especially when inspections or permits were still pending.Solar.com's composite of published customer feedback, not a customer quote

On-time project completion. Reviewers say installations were completed on time and, in some cases, within budget, which supports a generally reliable scheduling record. Representative review excerpt: "The installation was completed on time and within budget."

Smooth process from start to finish. Several reviewers describe the project moving smoothly from consultation through installation, with quick turnaround noted in some accounts. Representative review excerpt: "Very professional team that handled everything from consultation to installation smoothly."

Post-install delay concerns. A complaint pattern appears around projects that installed quickly but then waited for inspection or permit completion afterward. Representative review excerpt: "They were really quick to install, but since then, I have been waiting for the inspection."

Workmanship & site care

Workmanship7.4/10

Workmanship and site care receive the strongest pattern of praise in the review set. Reviewers commonly describe clean, professional crews and well-installed panels, with no clear complaint cluster in the evidence provided.Solar.com's composite of published customer feedback, not a customer quote

Clean, well-managed installs. Reviewers say the installation process was clean and well managed, pointing to good site care during the job. Representative review excerpt: "The installation process was clean and well managed."

Professional crews. Several reviewers describe the installation team as professional and smooth to work with throughout the project. Representative review excerpt: "Very professional team that handled everything from consultation to installation smoothly."

Panels installed well. Reviewers also say the panels looked good and were durable, suggesting solid workmanship in the installation itself. Representative review excerpt: "The panels are durable and well installed."

Long-term support & performance

Long-Term Support7.5/10

Long-term support and performance are mostly positive, with several reviewers reporting strong system output after activation. The main caution is that a small number of reviews describe unresolved post-install problems or systems that were not working as expected.Solar.com's composite of published customer feedback, not a customer quote

Strong system performance. Reviewers frequently report that the system is performing well, with comments about great results and successful operation after installation. Representative review excerpt: "The system is working perfectly and producing great results."

Bill and production improvement. Some reviewers say the system has produced strong savings results after going live, reflecting satisfaction with post-install performance. Representative review excerpt: "Thanks to Alejandro and the solar company, my installation was successful and my bill is now coming in negative."

Post-install problems in a minority of reviews. A smaller set report non-working equipment after the job was paid for, which points to occasional issues with support after activation. Representative review excerpt: "They took my money and left me with non-working solar panels and battery."

Bottom line: LE HOMES’ review profile is generally positive on installation quality, with many reviewers also praising communication and system performance. The more uneven areas are pricing transparency, sales expectations, and a few complaints about follow-through after install, especially around inspections, billing, and post-install support.

How this is built: category scores and summaries weigh the company's full published rating record (63 Google reviews averaging 4.9 stars), the most recent and most relevant review texts, and recurring feedback themes verified acrossGoogle and Yelp. Ratings and review excerpts from published review sources. Refreshed as new feedback is published. No installer can pay to change it.

About Le Homes

Company background from published business information and licensing records.

Products

Solar

Service area

California. Note: the install counts on this page cover California investor-owned-utility records only.

Work for this company or see something out of date? Profiles can be claimed and corrected: contact partners@solar.com. Placement on solar.com is never for sale.

Recorded installs by year

Residential interconnections statewide in PG&E, SCE, and SDG&E records through May 2026.
31
2022
93
'23
114
'24
79
'25
7
'26

Important context: this chart shows investor-owned-utility records only. Companies that shift work toward municipal-utility territory (LADWP and city power departments) or other states will show declining bars here even while building steadily elsewhere, and 2025-26 records also lag real installation dates. Treat this as a partial window, not the company's full trajectory.

FAQ about Le Homes

What do customers say in Le Homes reviews?

We analyzed 63 substantive published customer reviews of Le Homes in full. The company's Solar.com Installer Score is 7.7/10, with category-level detail on this page covering sales integrity, price transparency, communication, timeline reliability, workmanship, and long-term support.

How many solar systems has Le Homes installed?

Le Homes appears as installer of record on 296+ residential systems in California investor-owned-utility interconnection records through May 2026. Work in municipal-utility territory or other states does not appear in those public records.

How can I compare Le Homes' pricing?

Run your address through solar.com to see direct bids from vetted installers competing for your project, with pricing locked online. If you have a qualified quote from any installer, our Best Price Guarantee means we match better qualified prices.

Get bids from installers competing through solar.com.

Run your address and see direct pricing in about two minutes. No sales call required.

How we built this data

Methodology: Counts are residential PV interconnections in investor-owned-utility territory (PG&E, SCE, SDG&E) per CPUC Rule 21 public records through May 2026. Postal and name variants are merged. Municipal utility territory such as LADWP, Glendale, Pasadena, Burbank, Anaheim, and Riverside Public Utilities is not included in those CPUC counts. Counts show recorded installations, not quality ratings. Reported costs are self-reported on owned-system interconnections. No installer can pay for placement.

Who we are: Solar.com is a solar marketplace — we connect homeowners with installers and earn a fee when projects move forward. These rankings and scores are computed from public installation records and published customer reviews. No installer can pay for placement, and no installer — including those we work with — can pay to change a score.