Best solar companies California Quality Home Renovators

Quality Home Renovators Reviews

California installer. This profile is built from public installation records and published ratings, not paid placement.

297verified installs in California utility records*
0recent installs, 2025-26 records*
2012first year in county records
5.2/10Solar.com Score · 20 reviews analyzed

Solar.com Installer Score for Quality Home Renovators

One score, computed the same way for every installer. We read the full text of all 20 substantive published Quality Home Renovators review texts across every platform and measure what customers actually report. Not a survey. Not a sample. Never for sale.

Solar.com Installer Score

5.2/10

Blends the six category scores (70%) with the recency-weighted star record (30%).

Synthesized from 20 substantive customer review texts.

Yelp 2.1★ · 20 reviews

Updated September 28, 2026 · No installer can pay to change this score · How scores work →

Read what customers actually say ↓
Review star recordRecency-weighted star ratings across platforms, converted to a 0-10 signal before it is blended into the headline Solar.com Score.4.3

recency-weighted star ratings across platforms

Sales IntegrityHow clearly and honestly the company explains the system, contract, savings, and incentives before you sign.4.6

13 reviews speak to this · 0 praise · 13 complaints

Price TransparencyHow well the final price, financing terms, and incentive guidance match what customers were led to expect.5.7

5 reviews speak to this · 0 praise · 5 complaints

CommunicationHow reliably the company keeps customers informed and answers questions across sales, installation, and service.5.0

10 reviews speak to this · 2 praise · 8 complaints

Timeline ReliabilityHow well the company manages the path from contract through permits, installation, inspection, and turn-on — without the customer having to chase it.6.7

2 reviews speak to this · 1 praise · 1 complaints

WorkmanshipThe quality, professionalism, neatness, and property care of the physical installation.6.4

6 reviews speak to this · 3 praise · 3 complaints

Long-Term SupportHow well the system performs after turn-on, how the company handles monitoring, warranty claims, and service calls — and its staying power to honor them.5.0

5 reviews speak to this · 1 praise · 4 complaints

#647 of 678 scored in California by Solar.com Installer Score

How does Quality Home Renovators compare where you live? Rankings are local; an installer that leads one city can trail in the next. See how they rank in your city →

Why this differs from star ratings: most five-star reviews say “great company” and stop, and star averages reward that. These category scores only count reviews with concrete evidence, weighted by recency and the reviewer’s track record. A company can hold a strong star average while specific categories score lower; that gap is usually where the real story is. Categories with more complaints than praise are the questions worth asking any bidder, not necessarily dealbreakers.

Where Solar.com fits in

We score the installers. Then they compete for your roof.

Solar.com vets and scores every installer from public records and published reviews — then licensed installers bid on your actual roof. Real prices online, backed by the Best Price Guarantee. No sales calls, no pressure — you pick the winner.

See my price

Where Quality Home Renovators builds

County-by-county activity from CPUC records through May 2026.

What this data covers: *Counts on this page, including the totals up top, come from investor-owned-utility interconnection records (SCE, SDG&E, PG&E). Work in municipal-utility territory, such as LADWP or city utilities, and outside California does not appear here, so this company's true totals are higher than shown. Unlike the county rankings, this profile also shows counties below the 250-install ranking floor.

CountyVerified installsRecent 2025-26Active sinceMedian system% leasedCounty rankingLink to the county ranking page. This company's rank on this page is its Solar.com Installer Score rank, shown above.
San Diego County285020122.2 kW0.0%See county ranking →
Contra Costa County12020121.6 kW0.0%below ranking floor (under 250 installs)

% leased counts systems recorded as third party owned (lease or power purchase agreement); the remainder are customer owned. Median system size is the middle system this company installed in that county. Star ratings and review counts are from Google.

Quality Home Renovators reviews: what customers say

An independent synthesis of published customer feedback, updated September 28, 2026. Green marks praise, amber mixed experiences, red complaints.

Sales & proposal integrity

Sales Integrity4.6/10

Reviewers most often describe the sales process as pushy rather than informative, with repeated complaints about pressure, unclear presentations, and contract expectations. Several reviews also point to pricing changes or proposal terms that were not aligned with what customers expected.Solar.com's composite of published customer feedback, not a customer quote

Pushy sales approach. Reviewers say the sales pitch could be more informative and less aggressive, with multiple reports of persistent follow-up and pressure to move forward. Some customers describe feeling bothered during the initial contact process. Representative review excerpt: "I agree with the other reviews that the QHR sales pitch could be improved as it is more aggressive than informative."

Proposal and contract concerns. Reviewers report confusion or dissatisfaction around what was included in the contract, including claims that pricing changed after the original agreement. A few also describe proposal details that felt unclear or unexpectedly high. Representative review excerpt: "I worked with Rick Reifman and he increased the price twice for work that should have been included in our contract."

Unclear sales identity. One reviewer says the sales outreach involved a fictitious name and contractor license number, which added to concerns about how the company presented itself during the sales process. Representative review excerpt: "Furthermore the sales people they have out on the streets working for them operate using a fictitious name and contractor's licence number."

Price & financing transparency

Price Transparency5.7/10

Reviews on pricing and financing are mixed toward negative, with complaints about price increases, reimbursement disputes, and quotes that seemed high to reviewers. The main pattern is not about financing structure alone, but about customers feeling surprised by final amounts or related costs.Solar.com's composite of published customer feedback, not a customer quote

Unexpected price changes. Reviewers report that prices increased after work began or after the original quote, which left them feeling that the final cost did not match early expectations. Several comments frame the pricing as higher than they anticipated for the scope discussed. Representative review excerpt: "I worked with Rick Reifman and he increased the price twice for work that should have been included in our contract."

Quotes felt high. Some reviewers say the quoted price was far above other estimates they received, which raised concerns about transparency and value. These comments focus on the gap between the initial quote and what reviewers believed the job should cost. Representative review excerpt: "The next tier up from Bay View; The Anlin Catalina Series was still a whopping 8 grand less than QHR quoted price for the Bay View Series."

Reimbursement dispute. One reviewer describes an issue involving inspection-related costs and says the company did not reimburse them as expected. The review presents this as a pricing and cost-handling concern rather than a service-quality issue. Representative review excerpt: "I brought the inspection report and pictures to the owner at QHR and his way of handling the situation instead of reimbursing me for the money it cost me, was..."

Communication & coordination

Communication5.0/10

Communication is a clear pressure point in the review set, with more complaints than praise. Reviewers describe repeated calls, limited follow-through, and difficulty getting issues resolved, though a small number mention reassuring or helpful interactions.Solar.com's composite of published customer feedback, not a customer quote

Repeated or unwanted calls. Several reviewers say they kept receiving calls even after asking to be removed or after giving preferred contact instructions. These accounts suggest coordination problems during outreach and follow-up. Representative review excerpt: "When I talked with them and gave my cell # to them as not to bother my wife at home they still continued calling my house and not leaving messages."

Lack of follow-through after issues. Reviewers report that problems were not addressed promptly, including cases where calls went unanswered or concerns were ignored for extended periods. One review says the system had been down for months without a response. Representative review excerpt: "Our system has not worked for six months and they have ignored every single phone call."

Some helpful interactions. A small number of reviewers describe communication as reassuring or responsive, such as taking action on a do-not-call request or personally helping resolve remaining questions. These are present, but they are outnumbered by complaint-driven comments. Representative review excerpt: "I just spoke with the company and the gentleman I spoke to was very comforting, took our numbers and put them on the do not call list."

Timeline reliability

Timeline Reliability6.7/10

There are only a few timeline-related reviews, so the sample is limited. The available feedback is mostly neutral-to-positive, with one complaint describing a project experience that felt disorganized and one positive review noting a successful install that included added electrical work.Solar.com's composite of published customer feedback, not a customer quote

Positive completion example. One reviewer describes the project as completed successfully and notes that extra equipment was installed as part of the job. This review reflects a smooth completion experience in the limited timeline sample. Representative review excerpt: "Along with the upgraded panel they even installed a generator plug so that if street power is out I can power my home with a portable generator."

Disorganized project experience. Another reviewer describes the project as frustrating and says the company appeared to treat the schedule and related work as inconvenient. This review points to coordination issues rather than a clearly documented permit or activation delay. Representative review excerpt: "They harassed me throughout the entire project accusing me of wasting time; I guess they thought it was OK to purchase and then install flooring and tiles as well as..."

Workmanship & site care

Workmanship6.4/10

Feedback on workmanship and site care is mixed but leans somewhat positive. Reviewers praise professional installation and quality outcomes in several cases, while a smaller set describes workmanship problems, incomplete finishes, or damage-related concerns.Solar.com's composite of published customer feedback, not a customer quote

Professional installation reports. Some reviewers say the installation was professional and that the company followed up to address remaining questions or issues. These comments suggest that at least part of the install experience was handled carefully. Representative review excerpt: "QHR's installation was professional and following that install, the owner himself was kind enough to personally visit our home to ensure proper resolution of some issues/questions that remained."

Quality outcome examples. A few reviewers describe the finished work positively and say the project came out well. These comments are about the installed result and general job quality rather than long-term performance. Representative review excerpt: "We had CoolWall Exterior Coating applied to our 60 year old adobe home by Quality Home Renovators and the job couldn't have come out better!"

Installation problems reported. Other reviewers report poor workmanship or incomplete work, including complaints about how materials were installed or how issues were left behind. The negative feedback indicates that site care was not consistent across reviews. Representative review excerpt: "Poor workmanship when my solar panels were installed."

Long-term support & performance

Long-Term Support5.0/10

Post-install support is one of the weaker areas in the review set. Reviewers describe systems not working, service calls going unanswered, and warranty-related frustration, although one reviewer says they were satisfied with the price, warranty, and product quality delivered.Solar.com's composite of published customer feedback, not a customer quote

Service and response issues. Several reviewers say that after installation they had trouble getting help when something went wrong. The common pattern is a lack of response when customers reported ongoing system or service problems. Representative review excerpt: "Our system has not worked for six months and they have ignored every single phone call."

Warranty concerns. One reviewer says they were told a warranty-related issue could be handled with a loophole, which increased their frustration with post-install support. This is part of a broader set of warranty and repair concerns. Representative review excerpt: "When I complained, he threatened to "find a loophole in my warranty."

One satisfied post-install review. A positive review says the customer felt the company delivered on price, warranty, and product quality. This is present in the corpus, but it is outweighed by the complaint pattern in this category. Representative review excerpt: "Anyways, I just wanted to write this review because I feel like QHR deserves it based on the price, warranty and quality of product they delivered."

Bottom line: Across 20 substantive reviews, Quality Home Renovators scores 5.2/10 overall on Solar.com. Reviewers most often raise concerns about sales pressure, pricing transparency, communication, and post-install support, while workmanship and timeline feedback is somewhat more balanced. The review set includes a few positive reports, but the overall pattern is dominated by complaint-driven experiences.

How this is built: category scores and summaries weigh the company's full published rating record, the most recent and most relevant review texts, and recurring feedback themes verified acrossYelp. Ratings and review excerpts from published review sources. Refreshed as new feedback is published. No installer can pay to change it.

About Quality Home Renovators

Company background from published business information and licensing records.

Products

Solar

Service area

California. Note: the install counts on this page cover California investor-owned-utility records only.

Work for this company or see something out of date? Profiles can be claimed and corrected: contact partners@solar.com. Placement on solar.com is never for sale.

Recorded installs by year

Residential interconnections statewide in PG&E, SCE, and SDG&E records through May 2026.
54
2012
104
'13
55
'14
34
'15
50
'16
14
'17
7
'18
7
'19
8
'20
1
'21
1
'22

Important context: this chart shows investor-owned-utility records only. Companies that shift work toward municipal-utility territory (LADWP and city power departments) or other states will show declining bars here even while building steadily elsewhere, and 2025-26 records also lag real installation dates. Treat this as a partial window, not the company's full trajectory.

FAQ about Quality Home Renovators

What do customers say in Quality Home Renovators reviews?

We analyzed 20 substantive published customer reviews of Quality Home Renovators in full. The company's Solar.com Installer Score is 5.2/10, with category-level detail on this page covering sales integrity, price transparency, communication, timeline reliability, workmanship, and long-term support.

How many solar systems has Quality Home Renovators installed?

Quality Home Renovators appears as installer of record on 297+ residential systems in California investor-owned-utility interconnection records through May 2026. Work in municipal-utility territory or other states does not appear in those public records.

How can I compare Quality Home Renovators' pricing?

Run your address through solar.com to see direct bids from vetted installers competing for your project, with pricing locked online. If you have a qualified quote from any installer, our Best Price Guarantee means we match better qualified prices.

Get bids from installers competing through solar.com.

Run your address and see direct pricing in about two minutes. No sales call required.

How we built this data

Methodology: Counts are residential PV interconnections in investor-owned-utility territory (PG&E, SCE, SDG&E) per CPUC Rule 21 public records through May 2026. Postal and name variants are merged. Municipal utility territory such as LADWP, Glendale, Pasadena, Burbank, Anaheim, and Riverside Public Utilities is not included in those CPUC counts. Counts show recorded installations, not quality ratings. Reported costs are self-reported on owned-system interconnections. No installer can pay for placement.

Who we are: Solar.com is a solar marketplace — we connect homeowners with installers and earn a fee when projects move forward. These rankings and scores are computed from public installation records and published customer reviews. No installer can pay for placement, and no installer — including those we work with — can pay to change a score.