Best solar companies California Silverline Home Remodeling

Silverline Home Remodeling Reviews

Based in Canoga Park, CA. This profile is built from public installation records and published ratings, not paid placement.

816verified installs in California utility records*
69recent installs, 2025-26 records*
2016first year in county records
8.0/10Solar.com Score · 105 reviews analyzed

Solar.com Installer Score for Silverline Home Remodeling

One score, computed the same way for every installer. We read the full text of all 105 substantive published Silverline Home Remodeling review texts across every platform and measure what customers actually report. Not a survey. Not a sample. Never for sale.

Solar.com Installer Score

8.0/10

Blends the six category scores (70%) with the recency-weighted star record (30%).

Synthesized from 105 substantive customer review texts (108 published reviews collected).

Google 4.8★ · 49 reviewsYelp 4.1★ · 59 reviews

Updated September 28, 2026 · No installer can pay to change this score · How scores work →

Read what customers actually say ↓
Review star recordRecency-weighted star ratings across platforms, converted to a 0-10 signal before it is blended into the headline Solar.com Score.9.9

recency-weighted star ratings across platforms

Sales IntegrityHow clearly and honestly the company explains the system, contract, savings, and incentives before you sign.7.5

35 reviews speak to this · 30 praise · 5 complaints

Price TransparencyHow well the final price, financing terms, and incentive guidance match what customers were led to expect.6.5

23 reviews speak to this · 16 praise · 7 complaints

CommunicationHow reliably the company keeps customers informed and answers questions across sales, installation, and service.7.0

66 reviews speak to this · 50 praise · 16 complaints

Timeline ReliabilityHow well the company manages the path from contract through permits, installation, inspection, and turn-on — without the customer having to chase it.6.5

51 reviews speak to this · 35 praise · 15 complaints

WorkmanshipThe quality, professionalism, neatness, and property care of the physical installation.7.7

58 reviews speak to this · 50 praise · 7 complaints

Long-Term SupportHow well the system performs after turn-on, how the company handles monitoring, warranty claims, and service calls — and its staying power to honor them.7.9

43 reviews speak to this · 37 praise · 6 complaints

#337 of 678 scored in California by Solar.com Installer Score

How does Silverline Home Remodeling compare where you live? Rankings are local; an installer that leads one city can trail in the next. See how they rank in your city →

Why this differs from star ratings: most five-star reviews say “great company” and stop, and star averages reward that. These category scores only count reviews with concrete evidence, weighted by recency and the reviewer’s track record. A company can hold a strong star average while specific categories score lower; that gap is usually where the real story is. Categories with more complaints than praise are the questions worth asking any bidder, not necessarily dealbreakers.

Where Solar.com fits in

We score the installers. Then they compete for your roof.

Solar.com vets and scores every installer from public records and published reviews — then licensed installers bid on your actual roof. Real prices online, backed by the Best Price Guarantee. No sales calls, no pressure — you pick the winner.

See my price

Where Silverline Home Remodeling builds

County-by-county activity from CPUC records through May 2026.

What this data covers: *Counts on this page, including the totals up top, come from investor-owned-utility interconnection records (SCE, SDG&E, PG&E). Work in municipal-utility territory, such as LADWP or city utilities, and outside California does not appear here, so this company's true totals are higher than shown. Unlike the county rankings, this profile also shows counties below the 250-install ranking floor.

CountyVerified installsRecent 2025-26Active sinceMedian system% leasedCounty rankingLink to the county ranking page. This company's rank on this page is its Solar.com Installer Score rank, shown above.
Los Angeles County1531120176.0 kW0.0%below ranking floor (under 250 installs)
Santa Clara County1291920176.5 kW0.0%below ranking floor (under 250 installs)
Alameda County1191520165.2 kW0.0%below ranking floor (under 250 installs)
Orange County82520166.4 kW0.0%below ranking floor (under 250 installs)
Contra Costa County74720165.5 kW0.0%below ranking floor (under 250 installs)
Ventura County54820177.9 kW1.9%below ranking floor (under 250 installs)
Riverside County49020209.6 kW0.0%below ranking floor (under 250 installs)
San Mateo County39220196.6 kW0.0%below ranking floor (under 250 installs)
San Bernardino County36020208.1 kW0.0%below ranking floor (under 250 installs)
Kern County210202210.2 kW0.0%below ranking floor (under 250 installs)

% leased counts systems recorded as third party owned (lease or power purchase agreement); the remainder are customer owned. Median system size is the middle system this company installed in that county. Star ratings and review counts are from Google.

Silverline Home Remodeling reviews: what customers say

An independent synthesis of published customer feedback across Google and Yelp, updated September 28, 2026. Green marks praise, amber mixed experiences, red complaints.

Sales & proposal integrity

Sales Integrity7.5/10

Reviewers commonly describe the sales process as clear, thorough, and aligned with what was promised. A smaller set of complaints centers on responsiveness, project management, and a few cases where reviewers say expectations or install details were not handled as discussed.Solar.com's composite of published customer feedback, not a customer quote

Clear explanations and thorough planning. Many reviewers say the sales team took time to explain system options, review energy needs, and lay out the process in detail. These accounts suggest a generally organized proposal experience. Representative review excerpt: "Consultation and Planning: The process started with a thorough consultation where they carefully assessed my home’s energy needs and explained every aspect of the system they recommended."

Promised outcomes often matched delivery. Some customers report that the company delivered what it said it would and kept the project moving toward their timing goals. That pattern supports the stronger score in this category. Representative review excerpt: "They delivered exactly what they promised and made the whole experience as smooth as possible."

Responsiveness concerns appear in a minority of reviews. A smaller group of reviewers describes difficulty getting follow-up, delayed replies, or concerns about how project details were handled after the sale. These complaints keep the category from reading as uniformly positive. Representative review excerpt: "After repeated calls and text messages with Steve, he did not get back to me."

Price & financing transparency

Price Transparency6.5/10

Reviews are mixed on pricing and financing. Some customers describe reasonable quotes and helpful explanations of incentives or payment details, while others report higher-than-expected pricing, payment timing issues, or disputes over deposits and refunds.Solar.com's composite of published customer feedback, not a customer quote

Helpful pricing explanations in some reviews. Several reviewers say the quote was reasonable or that the team explained available incentives and rebates clearly. Those accounts suggest the company can be transparent on the front end. Representative review excerpt: "Nicole’s quote was very reasonable, and her coordination between the roofing company and her crew was perfect."

Customers sometimes felt pricing was Pricing. Some customers say the company tried to align pricing and was responsive when discussing costs. That helps offset, but does not eliminate, the more negative pricing comments. Representative review excerpt: "Good communication, quick and professional installation, post project support, and very competitive pricing."

Deposit and cost concerns show up repeatedly. A portion of reviewers report paying more than expected, carrying overlapping bills during the transition, or struggling to get deposits refunded. This is the main watch-out in the pricing category. Representative review excerpt: "I complained to the CSLB, but Steve Biton, the CEO, refused to refund the deposit and $4100 of the first payment, citing the amount of work put in."

Communication & coordination

Communication7.0/10

Most reviewers describe the team as responsive, clear, and helpful in coordinating moving parts of the project. The main complaints involve slow callbacks, incomplete updates, or inconsistent communication about project status.Solar.com's composite of published customer feedback, not a customer quote

Clear updates and project ownership. Positive reviews often mention clear timelines, useful explanations, and strong coordination with related trades or city officials. Customers who had this experience describe the process as easier to manage. Representative review excerpt: "What truly impressed me was their seamless coordination with both the roofing team and city officials – they handled all the logistics so I didn't have to."

Fast responses are a common praise point. Some reviewers say the team answered questions quickly and stayed helpful from financing through follow-up. That pattern supports the solid communication score. Representative review excerpt: "Whether it was a question about financing, the installation schedule, or follow-up after installation, they were always quick to respond and incredibly helpful."

Communication lapses still appear. A smaller set of reviewers report delayed callbacks or incomplete updates, including situations where they felt told one thing while the project was still unresolved. These comments point to occasional coordination breakdowns. Representative review excerpt: "After repeated calls and text messages with Steve, he did not get back to me."

Timeline reliability

Timeline Reliability6.5/10

Timeline feedback is mixed. Many customers report smooth installs and quick scheduling, but a meaningful minority describe long waits tied to permits, inspections, utility activation, or projects that ran beyond the expected window.Solar.com's composite of published customer feedback, not a customer quote

Some projects moved quickly. Several reviewers say installation and inspection were completed efficiently, with some jobs finished in a day and inspection set shortly after. Those reviews indicate the company can move fast when conditions allow. Representative review excerpt: "The cherry on top was that the job was finished in less than one day on a Friday, and they were able to schedule the inspection for the following Monday."

Owners sometimes pushed for speed. A few customers describe the company working actively to meet an important deadline or keep the process moving. These reports support the positive side of the timeline score. Representative review excerpt: "Steve, the owner, knew that we wanted to get the installation completed before the end of the year, and he did everything he could to move things along as quickly..."

Delays and incomplete closeout are a recurring issue. Other reviewers report long project durations, delayed certification, or systems still not completed after months. The complaints are substantial enough to keep timeline reliability in mixed territory. Representative review excerpt: "Gave only 4 stars because they took 4 months to complete the project, pass city certification and the company did a poor job at communicating this entire time."

Workmanship & site care

Workmanship7.7/10

Most reviewers give the installation team strong marks for professional conduct, clean work, and solid-looking installs. Still, a few complaints mention wiring problems, roof damage, or deficiencies that were not fully addressed after installation.Solar.com's composite of published customer feedback, not a customer quote

Professional crews and clean installs. Many reviewers say the crew was professional, organized, and careful with cleanup during or after the job. Those comments are a major reason this category scores well. Representative review excerpt: "In addition to the solar system, they also installed a Tesla Wall Connector in our garage, and everything was done cleanly and professionally."

Install quality is often described positively. Some customers report that the finished work looked good and the inspection process went smoothly. This suggests the team can deliver a clean installation experience. Representative review excerpt: "Beyond the fact that the install looks great and the install and inspection process was smooth, I got the impression that everyone genuinely enjoys working for Silverline and takes pride..."

A minority report installation defects. A smaller set of reviewers describe wiring issues, broken roof tiles, leaks, or other installation deficiencies. These concerns are material, but they are not the dominant pattern in the category. Representative review excerpt: "I originally left a 1-star review after experiencing several issues with my solar installation, including incorrect wiring, broken roof tiles that led to a roof leak, and interior ceiling damage..."

Long-term support & performance

Long-Term Support7.9/10

Post-install feedback is mostly positive, with reviewers frequently mentioning system setup help, monitoring guidance, and support after activation. The main complaints focus on unresolved service issues, wiring problems, or systems that were still not operating correctly after follow-up requests.Solar.com's composite of published customer feedback, not a customer quote

Helpful setup and monitoring support. Many reviewers say the team walked them through final setup and explained how to monitor system performance. That kind of handoff support is a strong point in the reviews. Representative review excerpt: "The team also took the time to walk me through the final setup, explaining how everything works, from the panels themselves to the monitoring system."

Strong performance guidance after installation. Some customers describe clear explanations of battery integration, app use, and ongoing system operation. These reviews support the category's above-average score. Representative review excerpt: "They carefully explain to me how to use the manufacturer's app to monitor their performance of the entire system."

Some service follow-up complaints remain. A smaller group of reviewers say they struggled to get service calls or resolution after a problem appeared, including cases where the system was not working as expected. Those reports are important but limited relative to the praise. Representative review excerpt: "Although Steven and Nicole are very nice, despite repeated requests over 3 months regarding issues with my 4-month-old solar system, I have not received a service call."

Bottom line: Across 105 substantive reviews, SILVERLINE HOME REMODELING is described most positively for its sales clarity, workmanship, and post-install support. The most common watch-outs involve pricing transparency, project timing, and occasional communication or service follow-through issues. Overall, the review profile is favorable, but not without recurring complaints in the middle stages of the project.

How this is built: category scores and summaries weigh the company's full published rating record (51 Google reviews averaging 4.8 stars), the most recent and most relevant review texts, and recurring feedback themes verified acrossGoogle and Yelp. Ratings and review excerpts from published review sources. Refreshed as new feedback is published. No installer can pay to change it.

About Silverline Home Remodeling

Company background from published business information and licensing records.

Also files CPUC records as: Silverline Solar, Silverline.

Products

Solar

Service area

California. Note: the install counts on this page cover California investor-owned-utility records only.

Work for this company or see something out of date? Profiles can be claimed and corrected: contact partners@solar.com. Placement on solar.com is never for sale.

Recorded installs by year

Residential interconnections statewide in PG&E, SCE, and SDG&E records through May 2026.
9
2016
26
'17
14
'18
55
'19
32
'20
58
'21
212
'22
330
'23
88
'24
65
'25
17
'26

Important context: this chart shows investor-owned-utility records only. Companies that shift work toward municipal-utility territory (LADWP and city power departments) or other states will show declining bars here even while building steadily elsewhere, and 2025-26 records also lag real installation dates. Treat this as a partial window, not the company's full trajectory.

FAQ about Silverline Home Remodeling

What do customers say in Silverline Home Remodeling reviews?

We analyzed 105 substantive published customer reviews of Silverline Home Remodeling in full. The company's Solar.com Installer Score is 8.0/10, with category-level detail on this page covering sales integrity, price transparency, communication, timeline reliability, workmanship, and long-term support.

How many solar systems has Silverline Home Remodeling installed?

Silverline Home Remodeling appears as installer of record on 816+ residential systems in California investor-owned-utility interconnection records through May 2026. Work in municipal-utility territory or other states does not appear in those public records.

How can I compare Silverline Home Remodeling's pricing?

Run your address through solar.com to see direct bids from vetted installers competing for your project, with pricing locked online. If you have a qualified quote from any installer, our Best Price Guarantee means we match better qualified prices.

Get bids from installers competing through solar.com.

Run your address and see direct pricing in about two minutes. No sales call required.

How we built this data

Methodology: Counts are residential PV interconnections in investor-owned-utility territory (PG&E, SCE, SDG&E) per CPUC Rule 21 public records through May 2026. Postal and name variants are merged. Municipal utility territory such as LADWP, Glendale, Pasadena, Burbank, Anaheim, and Riverside Public Utilities is not included in those CPUC counts. Counts show recorded installations, not quality ratings. Reported costs are self-reported on owned-system interconnections. No installer can pay for placement.

Who we are: Solar.com is a solar marketplace — we connect homeowners with installers and earn a fee when projects move forward. These rankings and scores are computed from public installation records and published customer reviews. No installer can pay for placement, and no installer — including those we work with — can pay to change a score.