Best solar companies California Baker Electric

Baker Electric Reviews

Based in Escondido, CA. This profile is built from public installation records and published ratings, not paid placement.

22,726verified installs in California utility records*
1,404recent installs, 2025-26 records*
2006first year in county records
7.4/10Solar.com Score · 2,723 reviews analyzed

Solar.com Installer Score for Baker Electric

One score, computed the same way for every installer. We read the full text of all 2,723 substantive published Baker Electric review texts across every platform and measure what customers actually report. Not a survey. Not a sample. Never for sale.

Solar.com Installer Score

7.4/10

Blends the six category scores (70%) with the recency-weighted star record (30%).

Synthesized from 2,723 substantive customer review texts (3,861 published reviews collected).

Google 4.8★ · 3,073 reviewsYelp 4.1★ · 788 reviews

Updated September 28, 2026 · No installer can pay to change this score · How scores work →

Read what customers actually say ↓
Review star recordRecency-weighted star ratings across platforms, converted to a 0-10 signal before it is blended into the headline Solar.com Score.9.7

recency-weighted star ratings across platforms

Sales IntegrityHow clearly and honestly the company explains the system, contract, savings, and incentives before you sign.7.0

487 reviews speak to this · 390 praise · 96 complaints

Price TransparencyHow well the final price, financing terms, and incentive guidance match what customers were led to expect.3.7

185 reviews speak to this · 62 praise · 120 complaints

CommunicationHow reliably the company keeps customers informed and answers questions across sales, installation, and service.6.4

944 reviews speak to this · 689 praise · 253 complaints

Timeline ReliabilityHow well the company manages the path from contract through permits, installation, inspection, and turn-on — without the customer having to chase it.5.7

291 reviews speak to this · 188 praise · 102 complaints

WorkmanshipThe quality, professionalism, neatness, and property care of the physical installation.8.1

774 reviews speak to this · 682 praise · 90 complaints

Long-Term SupportHow well the system performs after turn-on, how the company handles monitoring, warranty claims, and service calls — and its staying power to honor them.7.5

517 reviews speak to this · 352 praise · 162 complaints

#519 of 678 scored in California by Solar.com Installer Score

How does Baker Electric compare where you live? Rankings are local; an installer that leads one city can trail in the next. See how they rank in your city →

Why this differs from star ratings: most five-star reviews say “great company” and stop, and star averages reward that. These category scores only count reviews with concrete evidence, weighted by recency and the reviewer’s track record. A company can hold a strong star average while specific categories score lower; that gap is usually where the real story is. Categories with more complaints than praise are the questions worth asking any bidder, not necessarily dealbreakers.

Where Solar.com fits in

We score the installers. Then they compete for your roof.

Solar.com vets and scores every installer from public records and published reviews — then licensed installers bid on your actual roof. Real prices online, backed by the Best Price Guarantee. No sales calls, no pressure — you pick the winner.

See my price

Where Baker Electric builds

County-by-county activity from CPUC records through May 2026.

What this data covers: *Counts on this page, including the totals up top, come from investor-owned-utility interconnection records (SCE, SDG&E, PG&E). Work in municipal-utility territory, such as LADWP or city utilities, and outside California does not appear here, so this company's true totals are higher than shown. Unlike the county rankings, this profile also shows counties below the 250-install ranking floor.

CountyVerified installsRecent 2025-26Active sinceMedian system% leasedCounty rankingLink to the county ranking page. This company's rank on this page is its Solar.com Installer Score rank, shown above.
San Diego County20,3131,22720066.4 kW5.6%See county ranking →
Riverside County1,1957720098.6 kW14.7%See county ranking →
Orange County1,1398920107.8 kW8.6%See county ranking →
San Bernardino County641120149.7 kW7.8%below ranking floor (under 250 installs)
Los Angeles County15020137.7 kW6.7%below ranking floor (under 250 installs)

% leased counts systems recorded as third party owned (lease or power purchase agreement); the remainder are customer owned. Median system size is the middle system this company installed in that county. Star ratings and review counts are from Google.

Baker Electric reviews: what customers say

An independent synthesis of published customer feedback across Google and Yelp, updated September 28, 2026. Green marks praise, amber mixed experiences, red complaints.

Sales & proposal integrity

Sales Integrity7.0/10

Reviewers often describe the sales and proposal process as informative, thorough, and professional, with clear explanations of options and follow-up. At the same time, a smaller but meaningful set of reviews says contract details, handoffs, or pricing explanations did not match what they expected.Solar.com's composite of published customer feedback, not a customer quote

Informative consultations. Many reviewers say the sales conversation was clear and helpful, with staff taking time to explain options and project details. These comments frequently describe the experience as low-pressure and well organized. Representative review excerpt: "Very informative walk thru on products, costs and other key details that were important for my consideration."

Helpful follow-up. Some customers report that representatives were professional during the contract process and promised to follow up on questions. This points to a generally steady sales experience for many reviewers. Representative review excerpt: "Promised to follow up if customer had questions."

Proposal and contract issues. Complaints focus on mismatches between what was explained and what happened later, along with contract or handoff problems. Reviewers also describe occasional pricing shock or missing details during the proposal stage. Representative review excerpt: "Every step in the process, outside of signing the contract and making payments of course, did not go according to original explanation."

Price & financing transparency

Price Transparency3.7/10

This is one of the weaker-rated areas in the review set.Solar.com's composite of published customer feedback, not a customer quote

Unexpected or disputed charges. Negative reviews commonly mention surprise costs, diagnostic fees, and permit-related charges that were not clearly explained. Reviewers also describe frustration when pricing or payment expectations changed during the process. Representative review excerpt: "However, the same can't be said for the back office, who misrepresented the application to me of Baker's outrageous $750 charge for a diagnosis if the problem is not related..."

Price felt acceptable but high. Some customers describe the pricing as reasonable in context, but still expensive. These comments sit between approval of the service and caution about cost. Representative review excerpt: "Pricey options but considering everything, reasonable but pricey."

Some Pricing pricing. A few also felt the overall service package made the cost easier to accept. Representative review excerpt: "If you want a solar consultant who truly understands the local utility landscape, I highly recommend Mike—his pricing is also extremely competitive."

Communication & coordination

Communication6.4/10

Most reviewers praise responsive staff, clear updates, and coordinated handoffs during sales, scheduling, and service. The main complaints involve missed callbacks, slow follow-through, and difficulty reaching the right person when problems came up.Solar.com's composite of published customer feedback, not a customer quote

Responsive and attentive. Many reviewers say representatives called on time, explained issues clearly, and stayed in contact through the project. These comments suggest communication is often a strength during active jobs. Representative review excerpt: "Rep Assul Ruiz called on time and explained that it was a glitch between the LG EnerVu monitor and panels."

Proactive check-ins. Some customers describe staff making multiple check-ins and keeping them updated along the way. These experiences are usually framed as attentive project coordination. Representative review excerpt: "Matthew Mitchell was our rep and he came by multiple times to check in and make sure everyone was doing well - he even brought waters and snacks for the..."

Slow replies and handoff problems. Negative reviews focus on delayed responses, weak follow-up, and confusion when a point of contact changed. Some customers say they had trouble getting timely help once an issue needed attention. Representative review excerpt: "I would check in every few weeks and there were times when she didn't even respond then I was passed to a new project manager who surprisingly was worse."

Timeline reliability

Timeline Reliability5.7/10

Timeline feedback is mixed. Some reviewers report on-time work, smooth permitting, and prompt installation, while others describe delays, rescheduling, and repeated calls to keep projects moving.Solar.com's composite of published customer feedback, not a customer quote

On-schedule projects. Positive reviews say work was completed on schedule and that permitting and utility steps were handled smoothly. These customers often describe the process as organized and well managed. Representative review excerpt: "They completed the work on schedule and handled all the details with permitting and SDG&E."

Quick installation when things moved well. Some customers report that installation itself was quick and that the team stayed on time during the work. These comments usually pair speed with professional execution. Representative review excerpt: "Installation was quick, and he took his time with setting up my new thermostat, which I really appreciated."

Delays in permits and scheduling. Negative reviews commonly mention permit delays, repeated scheduling efforts, and long waits before work began. A few reviewers say they had to make many calls to get progress. Representative review excerpt: "I had to beg for my permit, and probably made 10 calls to get the work scheduled."

Workmanship & site care

Workmanship8.1/10

Workmanship is a major strength in the review corpus, with many customers praising professional crews, careful installation, and clean site handling. Complaints are present but comparatively rare, and they tend to focus on property damage, wiring or equipment mistakes, or site-care concerns.Solar.com's composite of published customer feedback, not a customer quote

Professional, clean installs. Reviewers frequently describe the crews as friendly, knowledgeable, and efficient. Many say the finished work looked clean and high quality. Representative review excerpt: "Friendly, knowledgeable, and efficient Michael made my panels look like mirrors."

Strong install quality. Some customers highlight detailed installation work on batteries, panels, and HVAC-related equipment, saying the crew did an excellent job. These reviews often emphasize confidence in the final result. Representative review excerpt: "Bobby and Andrew did amazing work, installing our Franklin battery and a new electrical panel, which now backs up our entire house."

Property damage and install concerns. Negative feedback includes reports of damaged gutters, roof-paper tears, and other site-care issues. A few reviews also describe concerns about incorrect equipment or installation-related mistakes. Representative review excerpt: "Severely dented our gutter with their ladder and tore roof paper during 10 minute inspection."

Long-term support & performance

Long-Term Support7.5/10

Post-install feedback is generally favorable, with many reviewers saying their systems performed well and that warranty or service help was available when needed. The main criticisms involve slow callbacks, unresolved equipment issues, and disagreements over diagnosis or repair handling.Solar.com's composite of published customer feedback, not a customer quote

Systems working well over time. Many reviewers say their solar systems continued to perform reliably after installation. Some also note that the company remained available for future warranty needs. Representative review excerpt: "The other reason is that they installed my solar panel system and it has worked flawlessly for 3 years since."

Helpful follow-up support. Positive reviews also mention technicians reviewing output, checking equipment, and reassuring customers that systems were operating properly. This suggests post-install support is often active and reassuring. Representative review excerpt: "She reviewed my power output from the past month and assured me everything was working properly."

Service delays and unresolved issues. Negative reviews describe slow callbacks, ongoing troubleshooting, and frustration when equipment problems were not resolved quickly. Some customers also question diagnosis or repair charges. Representative review excerpt: "However, the same can't be said for the back office, who misrepresented the application to me of Baker's outrageous $750 charge for a diagnosis if the problem is not related..."

Bottom line: Baker Electric’s review profile is strongest for workmanship and generally solid for sales clarity, communication, and long-term support. The clearest weakness is price and financing transparency, where reviewers most often describe unexpected charges, disputed fees, and unclear cost explanations. Timeline reliability is mixed, with some smooth projects but a noticeable number of delay-related complaints.

How this is built: category scores and summaries weigh the company's full published rating record (3,101 Google reviews averaging 4.8 stars), the most recent and most relevant review texts, and recurring feedback themes verified acrossGoogle and Yelp. Ratings and review excerpts from published review sources. Refreshed as new feedback is published. No installer can pay to change it.

About Baker Electric

Company background from published business information and licensing records.

Also files CPUC records as: Baker Electric Solar, Nb Baker Electric, N B Baker Electric, Baker Home Energy.

Products

Solar

Service area

California. Note: the install counts on this page cover California investor-owned-utility records only.

Work for this company or see something out of date? Profiles can be claimed and corrected: contact partners@solar.com. Placement on solar.com is never for sale.

Recorded installs by year

Residential interconnections statewide in PG&E, SCE, and SDG&E records through May 2026.
1
2006
7
'08
31
'09
76
'10
113
'11
226
'12
477
'13
825
'14
1364
'15
2080
'16
1530
'17
1809
'18
2325
'19
1589
'20
1952
'21
2824
'22
3131
'23
991
'24
1086
'25
322
'26

Important context: this chart shows investor-owned-utility records only. Companies that shift work toward municipal-utility territory (LADWP and city power departments) or other states will show declining bars here even while building steadily elsewhere, and 2025-26 records also lag real installation dates. Treat this as a partial window, not the company's full trajectory.

FAQ about Baker Electric

What do customers say in Baker Electric reviews?

We analyzed 2,723 substantive published customer reviews of Baker Electric in full. The company's Solar.com Installer Score is 7.4/10, with category-level detail on this page covering sales integrity, price transparency, communication, timeline reliability, workmanship, and long-term support.

How many solar systems has Baker Electric installed?

Baker Electric appears as installer of record on 22,726+ residential systems in California investor-owned-utility interconnection records through May 2026. Work in municipal-utility territory or other states does not appear in those public records.

How can I compare Baker Electric's pricing?

Run your address through solar.com to see direct bids from vetted installers competing for your project, with pricing locked online. If you have a qualified quote from any installer, our Best Price Guarantee means we match better qualified prices.

Get bids from installers competing through solar.com.

Run your address and see direct pricing in about two minutes. No sales call required.

How we built this data

Methodology: Counts are residential PV interconnections in investor-owned-utility territory (PG&E, SCE, SDG&E) per CPUC Rule 21 public records through May 2026. Postal and name variants are merged. Municipal utility territory such as LADWP, Glendale, Pasadena, Burbank, Anaheim, and Riverside Public Utilities is not included in those CPUC counts. Counts show recorded installations, not quality ratings. Reported costs are self-reported on owned-system interconnections. No installer can pay for placement.

Who we are: Solar.com is a solar marketplace — we connect homeowners with installers and earn a fee when projects move forward. These rankings and scores are computed from public installation records and published customer reviews. No installer can pay for placement, and no installer — including those we work with — can pay to change a score.