Best solar companies California Riverside County

Best solar companies in Riverside County (2026)

Every company ranked below is measured on what it has actually built in Riverside County: verified installs, recent activity, years in the county, system sizes, and ownership mix. Public installation records, not paid placement.

198,935verified Riverside County systems
95established companies ranked
$4.13/Wmedian reported cost, owned systems
from $2.41/Wsolar.com base pricing

Riverside County solar companies: rankings and reviews

Ranked by recent installs from CPUC records through May 2026, with review scores from every published customer review. Click any column to re-sort, or select companies to compare reviews side by side.

What this data covers: These counts come from SCE interconnection records, which cover most of Riverside County. Homes in the City of Riverside (Riverside Public Utilities), Moreno Valley Utility territory, and Banning are served by municipal utilities that do not publish comparable records, so installers focused on those areas show fewer installs here than they actually build.

Every company with 250 or more verified Riverside County installs, ranked by recent 2025-26 activity. All columns are Riverside County-specific. The county's 514 active installers in 2025 include smaller and occasional operations below that bar. Acquired brands count under their current parent: SolarCity under Tesla Energy, Vivint Solar under Sunrun. No per-installer price is published in the table.

Recent installs

Riverside County installs recorded in 2025 and 2026. A big historical name with thin recent activity is a different signal than a company building every week.

Verified installs

Residential systems in Riverside County public records listing that company as installer of record, all time. Real local activity, not review stars.

% leased

The share of that company's Riverside County systems recorded as third party owned, a lease or power purchase agreement. Ownership mix, not quality.

Solar.com Score

Every published customer review of each company, read in full and scored 0-10 across six categories. Under 20 reviews: not yet scored. Never for sale. How scores work →

#Installer
1SunrunIncludes Vivint Solar records7,36925,494201380.3%6.6531 reviewsGet a direct bid
2SunPower Corporation96223,561200727.9%6.2858 reviewsGet a direct bid
3Bright Ops9621,668202499.0%Not yet scoredGet a direct bid
4Sunnova Energy9046,471201498.6%Not yet scoredGet a direct bid
5Tesla EnergyIncludes SolarCity records80416,024200848.5%6.839 reviewsGet a direct bid
6GAF Energy669672202331.2%3.7101 reviewsGet a direct bid
7Freedom Forever4924,686201866.4%6.946 reviewsGet a direct bid
8Current Home Solar4042,348202198.1%Not yet scoredGet a direct bid
9Complete Solar3671,439201368.1%Not yet scoredGet a direct bid
10Renova Energy3518,386200842.3%6.8319 reviewsGet a direct bid
11Solara Home Energy30930920250.0%Not yet scoredGet a direct bid
12ESP Contracting3051,619202137.8%Not yet scoredGet a direct bid
13V3 Electric2831,107201671.4%Not yet scoredGet a direct bid
14Apollo Home Power268269202465.4%7.3188 reviewsGet a direct bid
15Hot Purple Energy2442,15420105.6%7.857 reviewsGet a direct bid
16Better Earth Electric2211,019202033.1%6.01,252 reviewsGet a direct bid
17My Smart House21927520240.0%5.2688 reviewsGet a direct bid
18SolarMax Renewable Energy Provider1922,853201512.9%Not yet scoredGet a direct bid
19Exo Energy1851,073202094.8%Not yet scoredGet a direct bid
20New Day Solar1691,60720122.9%7.993 reviewsGet a direct bid

Solar.com Scores are live for 47 of the 95 ranked companies. Companies marked “Not yet scored” have fewer than 20published reviews or are still being analyzed; scores appear as each company's full review record is processed. Select up to 4 companies to compare them category by category.

% leased counts systems recorded as third party owned, meaning a lease or power purchase agreement. The remainder are customer owned. Active installer counts include every company that filed an interconnection that year, down to small and occasional operations. Counts come from PG&E, SCE, and SDG&E interconnection records; homes served by municipal utilities like LADWP, SMUD, and city power departments interconnect through their local utility instead, so companies focused on those territories show fewer records here. The Solar.com Score is computed from the full text of each company's published customer reviews (star ratings and review counts sourced from Google and Yelp); it is separate from the install ranking and never for sale.

Where solar.com fits in

The ranking shows activity. Your bid decides everything else.

No sponsored slots. Placement is not for sale.

Vetted before they bid

Before an installer competes through solar.com, we check license, insurance, workmanship history, and service follow-through, and keep reviewing after every project.

Bid accountability

The number has to hold up with equipment, roof scope, adders, warranties, and timelines, on one address-specific scope you can compare line by line.

The price is guaranteed

Direct bids skip the retail sales channel, and the Best Price Guarantee backs the final number in writing.

Same crews. Different price.

Through solar.com, vetted installers compete for your project on one address-specific scope, and our Best Price Guarantee backs the bid.

$4.13/Wmedian reported install cost, owned systems (CPUC)
from $2.41/Wsolar.com base pricing before site adders

Riverside County city pages

Big inland loads, low base pricing, and a sharp split between SCE battery economics and Riverside Public Utilities municipal rules.

FAQ

Who has the best solar company reviews in Riverside County?

The Solar.com Score column ranks review quality directly: we read the full text of every published customer review of the county's established installers and score what reviewers actually report, 0-10, across sales integrity, price transparency, communication, timeline reliability, workmanship, and after-install support. Sort the table by Solar.com Score or select companies to compare their reviews side by side.

Who is the best solar company in Riverside County?

The best company depends on your roof, utility, equipment needs, and whether you want to own the system or use a lease-style agreement. The table ranks installers by verified Riverside County interconnection activity, not by ratings or paid placement.

How are Riverside County installers ranked here?

The list includes every company with at least 250 verified Riverside County installs in CPUC Rule 21 public records through May 2026, ranked by recent 2025-26 activity with all-time installs as the tiebreak. Every column is Riverside County-specific. Acquired brands are combined with their current parent, so SolarCity records count under Tesla Energy and Vivint Solar records count under Sunrun.

What does % leased (TPO) mean?

% leased (TPO) is the share of that installer's recorded systems that appear as third-party owned. It helps you see whether an installer historically skews toward owned systems, leases, or a mix.

How does solar.com pricing compare in Riverside County?

Riverside County has a median reported install cost of $4.13/W for owned CPUC records. Solar.com base pricing starts from $2.41/W, before site adders, with direct bids backed by the Best Price Guarantee.

Does being listed mean solar.com recommends that installer?

No. The public table reports verified installation volume only. The companies that bid on your home are separately vetted before they can compete through solar.com, and nobody can buy public placement here.

Get bids from installers competing through solar.com.

Run your address and see direct pricing for Riverside County in about two minutes. No sales call required.

Methodology: Counts are residential PV interconnections in investor-owned-utility territory (PG&E, SCE, SDG&E) per CPUC Rule 21 public records through May 2026. Postal and name variants are merged. Municipal utility territory such as LADWP, Glendale, Pasadena, Burbank, Anaheim, and Riverside Public Utilities is not included in those CPUC counts. Counts show recorded installations, not quality ratings. Reported costs are self-reported on owned-system interconnections. No installer can pay for placement.