Best solar companies California Current Home

Current Home Reviews

Based in Hemet, CA. This profile is built from public installation records and published ratings, not paid placement.

5,062verified installs in California utility records*
649recent installs, 2025-26 records*
2019first year in county records
7.6/10Solar.com Score · 834 reviews analyzed

Solar.com Installer Score for Current Home

One score, computed the same way for every installer. We read the full text of all 834 substantive published Current Home review texts across every platform and measure what customers actually report. Not a survey. Not a sample. Never for sale.

Solar.com Installer Score

7.6/10

Blends the six category scores (70%) with the recency-weighted star record (30%).

Synthesized from 834 substantive customer review texts (860 published reviews collected).

Google 4.6★ · 539 reviewsYelp 4.3★ · 321 reviews

Updated September 28, 2026 · No installer can pay to change this score · How scores work →

Read what customers actually say ↓
Review star recordRecency-weighted star ratings across platforms, converted to a 0-10 signal before it is blended into the headline Solar.com Score.9.9

recency-weighted star ratings across platforms

Sales IntegrityHow clearly and honestly the company explains the system, contract, savings, and incentives before you sign.7.2

361 reviews speak to this · 301 praise · 59 complaints

Price TransparencyHow well the final price, financing terms, and incentive guidance match what customers were led to expect.4.8

92 reviews speak to this · 48 praise · 44 complaints

CommunicationHow reliably the company keeps customers informed and answers questions across sales, installation, and service.7.4

518 reviews speak to this · 435 praise · 83 complaints

Timeline ReliabilityHow well the company manages the path from contract through permits, installation, inspection, and turn-on — without the customer having to chase it.6.1

158 reviews speak to this · 109 praise · 45 complaints

WorkmanshipThe quality, professionalism, neatness, and property care of the physical installation.7.1

148 reviews speak to this · 123 praise · 24 complaints

Long-Term SupportHow well the system performs after turn-on, how the company handles monitoring, warranty claims, and service calls — and its staying power to honor them.7.1

153 reviews speak to this · 106 praise · 47 complaints

#488 of 678 scored in California by Solar.com Installer Score

How does Current Home compare where you live? Rankings are local; an installer that leads one city can trail in the next. See how they rank in your city →

Why this differs from star ratings: most five-star reviews say “great company” and stop, and star averages reward that. These category scores only count reviews with concrete evidence, weighted by recency and the reviewer’s track record. A company can hold a strong star average while specific categories score lower; that gap is usually where the real story is. Categories with more complaints than praise are the questions worth asking any bidder, not necessarily dealbreakers.

Where Solar.com fits in

We score the installers. Then they compete for your roof.

Solar.com vets and scores every installer from public records and published reviews — then licensed installers bid on your actual roof. Real prices online, backed by the Best Price Guarantee. No sales calls, no pressure — you pick the winner.

See my price

Where Current Home builds

County-by-county activity from CPUC records through May 2026.

What this data covers: *Counts on this page, including the totals up top, come from investor-owned-utility interconnection records (SCE, SDG&E, PG&E). Work in municipal-utility territory, such as LADWP or city utilities, and outside California does not appear here, so this company's true totals are higher than shown. Unlike the county rankings, this profile also shows counties below the 250-install ranking floor.

CountyVerified installsRecent 2025-26Active sinceMedian system% leasedCounty rankingLink to the county ranking page. This company's rank on this page is its Solar.com Installer Score rank, shown above.
Riverside County2,90040420197.3 kW98.2%See county ranking →
San Bernardino County1,47921720197.3 kW98.8%See county ranking →
San Diego County4521420195.4 kW96.5%See county ranking →
Los Angeles County125620195.5 kW96.0%below ranking floor (under 250 installs)
Orange County106820197.5 kW93.4%below ranking floor (under 250 installs)

% leased counts systems recorded as third party owned (lease or power purchase agreement); the remainder are customer owned. Median system size is the middle system this company installed in that county. Star ratings and review counts are from Google.

Current Home reviews: what customers say

An independent synthesis of published customer feedback, updated September 23, 2026. Green marks praise, amber mixed experiences, red complaints.

Sales & proposal integrity

Sales Integrity7.2/10

Reviewers often describe the sales experience as knowledgeable and clear, with several saying explanations were patient and pressure-free. Complaints are present but less common than praise, and they center on high-pressure sales tactics, unclear promises, and disappointment when expected savings or production did not match expectations.Solar.com's composite of published customer feedback, not a customer quote

Clear, patient sales help. Many reviewers say the sales side was informative and supportive, with explanations that helped them understand the process and proposed savings. Some also describe representatives as honest and willing to walk through details without pressure. Representative review excerpt: "He was honest, knowledgeable, and took the time to explain everything clearly without any pressure."

Transparent proposal guidance. A number of reviewers say they received straightforward guidance on costs, savings, and rebate-related paperwork. These comments suggest the proposal process was understandable for many customers. Representative review excerpt: "He was very transparent in how much money I am saving in my electricity bill and the overall cost of solar."

Pressure and promise concerns. Some reviewers report feeling pushed during the site visit or say the system did not perform as promised after sale. The complaint pattern includes pressure concerns and frustration over expectations that were not met. Representative review excerpt: "It seems like they use the guise of the site visit to make it more of a high pressure sales situation rather than an actual estimate."

Price & financing transparency

Price Transparency4.8/10

This category is mixed to negative. A handful of reviewers describe clear pricing or financing explanations, but complaints are substantial and focus on deposits, quote surprises, payment mismatches, and frustration around incentive timing or refund-related issues.Solar.com's composite of published customer feedback, not a customer quote

Payment and quote mismatch complaints. Other reviewers say the quoted price or payment terms did not match what they were told, and some describe a deposit or payment issue that remained unresolved. This is the main complaint pattern in the category. Representative review excerpt: "I had a representative, Nate, come to my home and assure me he could offer a great deal, only to provide an unreasonably high quote."

Deposit and timing frustration. Some reviewers mention long waits after a deposit or dissatisfaction with how money and timing were handled. These comments point to concern about financial follow-through rather than the installation itself. Representative review excerpt: "8 months ago I wrote current home a deposit check."

Some clear cost explanations. A portion of reviewers say they understood the overall cost and payment structure, and some felt the pricing discussion matched their expectations. These reviews indicate that financing details were clear for at least some customers. Representative review excerpt: "I did my homework and met with 6 or 7 different solar companies, got familiarized with what I may need, at my budget and also thinking of future needs and..."

Communication & coordination

Communication7.4/10

Reviewers generally describe communication as a strength, with many saying staff stayed in touch, answered questions, and helped coordinate the project. The complaints are material, though, and focus on unreturned messages, sporadic updates, and frustration when customers say they had to keep chasing answers.Solar.com's composite of published customer feedback, not a customer quote

Frequent, helpful updates. Many reviewers say they were kept informed throughout the project and could reach someone when they had questions. These comments describe a responsive team that helped coordinate next steps. Representative review excerpt: "It went smoothly and easily with no problems whatsoever Duke and Amiah were amazing in helping me keeping me updated with the process and the contractors that did the install..."

Supportive point of contact. Several reviewers describe specific staff members as patient, supportive, and easy to contact. That pattern suggests some customers experienced consistent project ownership. Representative review excerpt: "She was only a txt or phone call away if I needed an answer to my questions."

Unresponsive follow-up complaints. Other reviewers say emails, texts, and calls went unanswered for long periods, or that they had trouble getting issues addressed. The complaint pattern centers on poor follow-through rather than one-off delays. Representative review excerpt: "Getting Current Home to address this issue was an exercise in pure frustration: Unresponsive Customer Service: Countless emails, texts, and phone calls went completely ignored for months."

Timeline reliability

Timeline Reliability6.1/10

Reviews lean positive on timing when projects moved through permits, inspections, and activation on schedule or close to it. Still, complaint patterns are meaningful and focus on delays, missed callbacks, and long waits for updates or resolution after issues came up.Solar.com's composite of published customer feedback, not a customer quote

Some timely projects. Several reviewers say the process moved fairly quickly and that the timeline matched what they were told. These reviews describe installs and approvals that finished in a reasonable window. Representative review excerpt: "The process was fairly fast regarding plans, permits, install and city approval as it took approximately 4-6 weeks."

Clear permit and inspection coordination. Some customers say they were kept updated on permits, inspections, and what would happen next. That suggests decent coordination for part of the customer base. Representative review excerpt: "They kept me updated throughout the project and communicated clearly about inspections, permits, and what to expect next."

Delay and no-update complaints. Other reviewers report long waits, stalled follow-up, and little to no communication while they were waiting for completion or repair. These comments make schedule reliability a recurring concern. Representative review excerpt: "To date, we have yet to get any updates, and we have a useless system and have been waiting nearly 2 months and no end in sight."

Workmanship & site care

Workmanship7.1/10

Most reviewers describe the install crews as professional, clean, and efficient, and many say the job site was left in good condition. The negative reviews, however, point to installation mistakes, damaged property, and cleanup problems that some customers say required follow-up.Solar.com's composite of published customer feedback, not a customer quote

Professional install crews. Many reviewers praise the crews for being on time, respectful, and efficient. Several also describe the finished install as clean and well handled. Representative review excerpt: "The crew arrived on time, treated my home with respect, and made sure everything was clean before they left."

Clean workmanship reports. Some customers say the installation was neat and professional from start to finish. These reviews suggest solid workmanship for many projects. Representative review excerpt: "Very clean and professional install."

Property damage and cleanup issues. A smaller but important set of reviewers describe damaged roof materials, faulty work, or trash left behind after installation. The complaint pattern is centered on site care and installation quality. Representative review excerpt: "Current home was the company in charge of installing our solar on our brand new home, unbeknown to us, they cracked over 200 tiles on our roof and installed faulty..."

Long-term support & performance

Long-Term Support7.1/10

Post-install support receives many positive comments, especially when customers needed service, repairs, or help resolving issues after activation. Complaints remain significant and focus on underperformance, repeated service contact, and frustration when customers say support did not address system problems quickly.Solar.com's composite of published customer feedback, not a customer quote

Responsive repair support. Many reviewers say service staff and repair crews were helpful once issues came up after installation. These comments suggest post-install support can be effective for routine follow-up. Representative review excerpt: "From the solar install to a few repairs, customer service, installers, and repair crews have been great to work with..."

Helpful problem resolution. Some customers describe technicians as quick to respond and able to resolve problems faster than expected. Others say they felt supported after the install when a backup or service issue appeared. Representative review excerpt: "Super friendly, kept me informed the whole time, and resolved my problem faster than expected.Great technician and great service overall."

Performance and support complaints. Other reviewers report production below expectations or say they had to keep contacting the company to get answers about system issues. This is the main negative pattern in the category. Representative review excerpt: "In reality, over the past three months, the system has produced a mere 620 kWh per month—a fraction of what was promised."

Bottom line: Current Home’s review profile is mixed, with stronger feedback around communication, sales explanation, and install professionalism than around pricing, timeline reliability, and post-sale follow-through. The main complaint themes are quote or payment concerns, delays, and service issues after installation, while many customers still describe a smooth and well-communicated process overall.

How this is built: category scores and summaries weigh the company's full published rating record (540 Google reviews averaging 4.6 stars), the most recent and most relevant review texts, and recurring feedback themes verified acrossGoogle and Yelp. Ratings and review excerpts from published review sources. Refreshed as new feedback is published. No installer can pay to change it.

About Current Home

Company background from published business information and licensing records.

Also files CPUC records as: Current Home Solar.

Products

Solar

Service area

California. Note: the install counts on this page cover California investor-owned-utility records only.

Work for this company or see something out of date? Profiles can be claimed and corrected: contact partners@solar.com. Placement on solar.com is never for sale.

Recorded installs by year

Residential interconnections statewide in PG&E, SCE, and SDG&E records through May 2026.
170
2019
395
'20
976
'21
1356
'22
1062
'23
468
'24
428
'25
221
'26

Important context: this chart shows investor-owned-utility records only. Companies that shift work toward municipal-utility territory (LADWP and city power departments) or other states will show declining bars here even while building steadily elsewhere, and 2025-26 records also lag real installation dates. Treat this as a partial window, not the company's full trajectory.

FAQ about Current Home

What do customers say in Current Home reviews?

We analyzed 834 substantive published customer reviews of Current Home in full. The company's Solar.com Installer Score is 7.6/10, with category-level detail on this page covering sales integrity, price transparency, communication, timeline reliability, workmanship, and long-term support.

How many solar systems has Current Home installed?

Current Home appears as installer of record on 5,062+ residential systems in California investor-owned-utility interconnection records through May 2026. Work in municipal-utility territory or other states does not appear in those public records.

How can I compare Current Home's pricing?

Run your address through solar.com to see direct bids from vetted installers competing for your project, with pricing locked online. If you have a qualified quote from any installer, our Best Price Guarantee means we match better qualified prices.

Get bids from installers competing through solar.com.

Run your address and see direct pricing in about two minutes. No sales call required.

How we built this data

Methodology: Counts are residential PV interconnections in investor-owned-utility territory (PG&E, SCE, SDG&E) per CPUC Rule 21 public records through May 2026. Postal and name variants are merged. Municipal utility territory such as LADWP, Glendale, Pasadena, Burbank, Anaheim, and Riverside Public Utilities is not included in those CPUC counts. Counts show recorded installations, not quality ratings. Reported costs are self-reported on owned-system interconnections. No installer can pay for placement.

Who we are: Solar.com is a solar marketplace — we connect homeowners with installers and earn a fee when projects move forward. These rankings and scores are computed from public installation records and published customer reviews. No installer can pay for placement, and no installer — including those we work with — can pay to change a score.