Sales & proposal integrity
Sales Integrity5.3/10
Reviews on sales and proposal integrity are mixed. Many reviewers describe clear explanations, helpful design guidance, and low-pressure conversations, while a substantial complaint pattern centers on expectations not matching the final proposal, follow-up outreach, or sales interactions that felt intrusive.Solar.com's composite of published customer feedback, not a customer quote
Clear and helpful sales conversations. Reviewers say representatives often explained system design, performance, and battery options clearly and answered questions without pushing. Some also report that the team took time to adjust proposals after reviewing roof or panel constraints. Representative review excerpt: "They took the time to explain the system design, expected performance, and battery options clearly, without any pressure or upselling."
Low-pressure guidance. Several reviewers describe a no-pressure sales process and note that reps returned to walk through the offer again when asked. These comments suggest some customers felt the proposal process was informative rather than aggressive. Representative review excerpt: "The Sales Rep Briana at our request returned after the initial meeting so we could discuss the offer, no pressure sales."
Expectation mismatches and intrusive outreach. Complaint reviews describe cases where energy-usage assumptions, contract details, or installation expectations did not line up with what customers believed they had agreed to. A few reviewers also report repeated outreach or sales contact that they found unwelcome. Representative review excerpt: "We explained to her that we have not lived in this home for a year, so we did not have accurate representations of our energy usage, now that we have..."
Price & financing transparency
Price Transparency4.9/10
Price and financing transparency land in mixed-to-negative territory. Reviewers often say financing explanations were thorough and helpful, but there are recurring complaints about reimbursement, payment timing, account records, and whether savings or billing outcomes matched expectations.Solar.com's composite of published customer feedback, not a customer quote
Financing explained in detail. Positive reviews say staff walked through cost savings, financing, and consumer rights in depth, and in some cases helped secure the loan for the project. These customers describe the pricing conversation as clear and educational. Representative review excerpt: "He went in depth about everything from the cost savings, to the system, to financing, as well as my rights as a solar consumer."
Savings and billing outcomes vary. Some reviewers report lower bills or satisfactory savings after the system was running, while others say they were still paying utility and system charges during the early months or did not see the billing outcome they expected. This points to mixed experiences around pricing expectations and incentive timing. Representative review excerpt: "In the meantime, we still had to pay PG&E for electrical and now paying for our solar system that took a couple months to get up and running."
Payment and account follow-through concerns. Complaint reviews mention reimbursement delays, billing confusion, or missing records tied to later service or recertification requests. These accounts suggest that transparency around payments and post-sale account handling was not consistent for everyone. Representative review excerpt: "Fast forward 5 years and I call to request another inspection and they state that they have no record of our account and no record of payment for recertification."
Communication & coordination
Communication5.3/10
Communication and coordination are a clear mixed area. Many reviewers describe prompt answers, consistent follow-up, and smooth handoffs, but there is also a noticeable set of complaints about poor responsiveness, unanswered requests, and difficulty getting callbacks or issue resolution.Solar.com's composite of published customer feedback, not a customer quote
Prompt and clear updates. Reviewers frequently say questions were answered quickly and the process was well coordinated from the first visit through post-install support. Several mention strong customer service and dependable follow-up. Representative review excerpt: "Communication throughout the process was excellent, and any questions I had were answered promptly and clearly."
Good coordination across the project. Some customers describe the team as organized and attentive to details, including aesthetic placement and post-install follow-through. These reviews suggest communication worked well when the project stayed on track. Representative review excerpt: "They ask where I wanted to place the cable conduit on the house and in the garage to keep the esthetics of the house looking nice."
Responsiveness problems after issues arose. Complaint reviews describe long waits for callbacks, being bounced around, or feeling ignored after raising concerns. A few also report aggressive or persistent contact that became frustrating rather than helpful. Representative review excerpt: "Got hung up on by the “manager” when I asked for a callback to confirm they have received my complaint after 3 attempts, stating, “why would I call you back..."
Timeline reliability
Timeline Reliability6.4/10
Timeline reliability is roughly balanced, with more positive than negative reviews but still enough complaints to matter. Reviewers often say installation, permits, and activation moved at a reasonable pace, while others report inspection delays, missed scheduling, or no-shows that stretched the process out.Solar.com's composite of published customer feedback, not a customer quote
Reasonable start-to-finish timing. Several reviewers say the project moved quickly enough, with installation and activation completed within a timeframe they considered reasonable. Some also note that permits, city inspections, and HOA-related steps were handled smoothly. Representative review excerpt: "From installation to full activation, it took a little over a month, which felt reasonable given PG&E timelines."
Professional scheduling when things stayed on track. Positive reviews describe crews arriving on schedule and completing work efficiently, with clear end-of-install walkthroughs. These comments suggest the timeline can be solid when coordination is working well. Representative review excerpt: "The installation itself was carried out on schedule by a professional and tidy crew, and everything was completed to a high standard."
Inspection and scheduling delays. Complaint reviews describe systems being installed before inspections were arranged, delays waiting for utility scheduling, or wasted time due to missed appointments. The recurring issue is not just delay, but the feeling that the delay was avoidable. Representative review excerpt: "Then once they finally got the system in they had not arranged any of the inspections so it took them over 3 weeks to get the inspectors out there could..."
Workmanship & site care
Workmanship8.1/10
Workmanship and site care are a relative strength. Most reviewers describe professional crews, clean installs, and careful handling of property, though a smaller complaint pattern mentions damage, follow-up repairs, or installation decisions that later needed correction.Solar.com's composite of published customer feedback, not a customer quote
Professional, tidy crews. Many reviewers say the installation team was professional, friendly, and careful with property. Clean jobsite comments and on-schedule completion appear repeatedly in the positive reviews. Representative review excerpt: "The installation itself took two days, and the crew was excellent—on time, professional, friendly, and very careful with our property."
Clean installs with attention to detail. Customers also note that crews kept the work neat and completed the system efficiently, sometimes in just a day or two. These reviews emphasize site care as a consistent strength. Representative review excerpt: "Had 2 phases 1st phase was 19 panels + full battery backup compartment 2nd phase 22 panels Total 41 LG panels Loved the professional install and how clean everything was..."
Property damage and repair follow-up. A smaller set of complaint reviews mention damaged drywall, damaged property, or repairs that customers were told to arrange separately. While less common than praise, these reports show that site care was not flawless for every project. Representative review excerpt: "Problem is my ceiling drywall was damaged as well and they don't do those repairs any longer so they tell us to have it repaired and they will reimburse us."
Long-term support & performance
Long-Term Support8.0/10
Long-term support and system performance are another strong area overall. Reviewers often say the system is producing as expected, batteries respond during outages, and post-install service resolved issues, though a smaller set of complaints points to warranty friction, service delays, or component problems after turn-on.Solar.com's composite of published customer feedback, not a customer quote
Strong production and battery performance. Many reviewers report that the system performed as expected after activation, with some noting meaningful bill reduction or reliable battery backup during outages. These comments suggest solid post-install performance for a large share of customers. Representative review excerpt: "Update after one year we are very satisfied with the solar panels and it lowered our electrical bills about $200 to be precise!"
Fast repair response in some cases. Some reviewers say a defect was found and repaired quickly, after which the system returned to normal operation. Others describe battery or monitoring functions working well once the project was fully online. Representative review excerpt: "But once the defective part was discovered and repaired within 24 hours, my system was up and running perfectly."
Warranty and service frustrations. Complaint reviews mention difficulty reaching service help, outside repair referrals, or issues with components after the system had been operating for years. The recurring concern is less about initial installation and more about getting post-install support when something needs attention. Representative review excerpt: "Initially I was told there was no service department anymore and I was sent to an outside company who wanted to charge me thousands of dollars to just evaluate my..."
How this is built: category scores and summaries weigh the company's full published rating record (191 Google reviews averaging 4.1 stars), the most recent and most relevant review texts, and recurring feedback themes verified acrossGoogle and Yelp. Ratings and review excerpts from published review sources. Refreshed as new feedback is published. No installer can pay to change it.