Best solar companies California Gaf Energy

Gaf Energy Reviews

Based in San Jose, CA. This profile is built from public installation records and published ratings, not paid placement.

5,891verified installs in California utility records*
5,325recent installs, 2025-26 records*
2019first year in county records
3.8/10Solar.com Score · 104 reviews analyzed

Solar.com Installer Score for Gaf Energy

One score, computed the same way for every installer. We read the full text of all 104 substantive published Gaf Energy review texts across every platform and measure what customers actually report. Not a survey. Not a sample. Never for sale.

Solar.com Installer Score

3.8/10

Blends the six category scores (70%) with the recency-weighted star record (30%).

Synthesized from 104 substantive customer review texts (109 published reviews collected).

Google 2.0★ · 106 reviewsYelp 1.3★ · 3 reviews

Updated September 28, 2026 · No installer can pay to change this score · How scores work →

Read what customers actually say ↓
Review star recordRecency-weighted star ratings across platforms, converted to a 0-10 signal before it is blended into the headline Solar.com Score.3.3

recency-weighted star ratings across platforms

Sales IntegrityHow clearly and honestly the company explains the system, contract, savings, and incentives before you sign.4.7

14 reviews speak to this · 1 praise · 13 complaints

Price TransparencyHow well the final price, financing terms, and incentive guidance match what customers were led to expect.4.0

13 reviews speak to this · 0 praise · 13 complaints

CommunicationHow reliably the company keeps customers informed and answers questions across sales, installation, and service.1.9

94 reviews speak to this · 16 praise · 78 complaints

Timeline ReliabilityHow well the company manages the path from contract through permits, installation, inspection, and turn-on — without the customer having to chase it.2.0

69 reviews speak to this · 6 praise · 62 complaints

WorkmanshipThe quality, professionalism, neatness, and property care of the physical installation.6.4

16 reviews speak to this · 11 praise · 5 complaints

Long-Term SupportHow well the system performs after turn-on, how the company handles monitoring, warranty claims, and service calls — and its staying power to honor them.5.0

35 reviews speak to this · 5 praise · 29 complaints

#677 of 678 scored in California by Solar.com Installer Score

How does Gaf Energy compare where you live? Rankings are local; an installer that leads one city can trail in the next. See how they rank in your city →

Why this differs from star ratings: most five-star reviews say “great company” and stop, and star averages reward that. These category scores only count reviews with concrete evidence, weighted by recency and the reviewer’s track record. A company can hold a strong star average while specific categories score lower; that gap is usually where the real story is. Categories with more complaints than praise are the questions worth asking any bidder, not necessarily dealbreakers.

Where Solar.com fits in

We score the installers. Then they compete for your roof.

Solar.com vets and scores every installer from public records and published reviews — then licensed installers bid on your actual roof. Real prices online, backed by the Best Price Guarantee. No sales calls, no pressure — you pick the winner.

See my price

Where Gaf Energy builds

County-by-county activity from CPUC records through May 2026.

What this data covers: *Counts on this page, including the totals up top, come from investor-owned-utility interconnection records (SCE, SDG&E, PG&E). Work in municipal-utility territory, such as LADWP or city utilities, and outside California does not appear here, so this company's true totals are higher than shown. Unlike the county rankings, this profile also shows counties below the 250-install ranking floor.

CountyVerified installsRecent 2025-26Active sinceMedian system% leasedCounty rankingLink to the county ranking page. This company's rank on this page is its Solar.com Installer Score rank, shown above.
San Diego County84178120193.8 kW10.1%See county ranking →
San Bernardino County72170920213.3 kW46.9%See county ranking →
Riverside County67266920234.1 kW31.2%See county ranking →
Los Angeles County44836720204.2 kW20.5%See county ranking →
Fresno County41040920234.6 kW29.3%See county ranking →
Orange County40835920204.5 kW14.5%See county ranking →
Kern County38838720244.6 kW43.3%See county ranking →
San Joaquin County38737920224.2 kW23.3%See county ranking →
Madera County34734720254.6 kW20.2%See county ranking →
Yuba County18518220234.6 kW25.4%below ranking floor (under 250 installs)

% leased counts systems recorded as third party owned (lease or power purchase agreement); the remainder are customer owned. Median system size is the middle system this company installed in that county. Star ratings and review counts are from Google.

Gaf Energy reviews: what customers say

An independent synthesis of published customer feedback across Google and Yelp, updated September 23, 2026. Green marks praise, amber mixed experiences, red complaints.

Sales & proposal integrity

Sales Integrity4.7/10

Reviewers most often describe sales and proposal issues as a source of frustration, with complaints focused on unclear expectations, missing or incomplete proposal details, and difficulty getting timely help after signing. A smaller set of reviews describes the initial proposal as accurate and aligned with later production expectations.Solar.com's composite of published customer feedback, not a customer quote

Proposal details and expectations. Reviewers say some key proposal information was missing or not fully explained before signing, which led to confusion about what was included and who would handle each step. Representative review excerpt: "Long version: We found out after installation that a crucial page had been left out of the proposal we were provided before signing the contract."

Difficulty getting answers. Several reviewers report trouble reaching support or getting consistent responses after the sale, with some describing repeated calls and transfers. Representative review excerpt: "Throughout the whole process we have had THE WORST time trying to speak to anyone, then often times we get sent to someone out of the country and no one..."

Initial proposal matched output. A few reviewers say the quoted production level was close to what they saw after installation, suggesting the initial proposal was accurate for them. Representative review excerpt: "So far, power production on a sunny, cloudless day is a little less than the rated peak power, as quoted in the initial proposal, but I'm hoping that will improve..."

Price & financing transparency

Price Transparency4.0/10

Reviewers most often raise concerns about deposits, final pricing, and unclear timing around setup or activation after payment. The available reviews in this category are overwhelmingly complaint-driven, with little evidence of clear praise around pricing or financing communication.Solar.com's composite of published customer feedback, not a customer quote

Payment timing and deposits. Some reviewers describe paying in full or placing funds during closing, then waiting without clear next steps or timely follow-through. Representative review excerpt: "Paid the full purchase price for the panels as part of closing escrow."

No clear timeline after payment. Reviewers report that even after permission to operate, they were still told setup was needed with no clear timeline provided. Representative review excerpt: "Now that we have our permission to operate, GAF has stated they “still need to set things up” in order to turn on our solar, with no timeline given, again."

Refund and support frustration. Several reviews describe difficulty getting help from customer care when they had billing or account questions, with little resolution reported. Representative review excerpt: "Their customer care center can’t do anything other than leave a message or escalate to a supervisor."

Communication & coordination

Communication1.9/10

This is the weakest-rated category, and reviewers overwhelmingly describe poor responsiveness, missed follow-through, and a lack of clear ownership across the project. Positive reviews do exist, but they are outnumbered by complaints about repeated calls, unanswered emails, and coordination breakdowns.Solar.com's composite of published customer feedback, not a customer quote

Repeated contact with no action. Reviewers frequently report emailing and calling many times without getting meaningful progress or a clear response. Representative review excerpt: "Emailed so many times and called their support team but no action."

Delays in coordination. Some reviewers say they were told work or submissions would be handled, but those follow-ups did not happen when expected. Representative review excerpt: "I have called multiple times over months, and each time I was told that my PTO application would be submitted “now” or that someone would “take care of it.” I..."

Helpful project coordinators. A smaller group of reviews describes specific coordinators as organized, professional, and helpful in keeping the project moving. Representative review excerpt: "Veronica guided us through the setup, scheduling, and other work, David made sure the roof installation went smoothly and went perfectly, Aaron and Andrew acted incredibly professional during the electrical..."

Timeline reliability

Timeline Reliability2.0/10

Reviewers most often describe long waits for permitting, activation, and utility-related steps, along with missed timing expectations. A handful of reviews report smooth or timely progress, but the dominant pattern is delay and uncertainty.Solar.com's composite of published customer feedback, not a customer quote

Long waits for activation. Many reviewers say their systems were installed but still were not activated for weeks or months afterward. Representative review excerpt: "Eventually, PTO was approved in April, but even after approval, I have been waiting over two weeks for system activation."

Missed schedule expectations. Some reviews describe being told the process would take a shorter period, only to still be waiting months later. Representative review excerpt: "(I was warned by the title company that's handled many homes with GAF solar that it could take 2-3 months) It's now been over 4 months; I have reached out..."

Smooth timeline for some projects. A few reviewers report the process moving smoothly from installation through final inspections and completion. Representative review excerpt: "Everything went smoothly from the first site visit, installation and cleanup to the final inspections."

Workmanship & site care

Workmanship6.4/10

This category is more favorable than the rest of the review set, with many reviewers describing professional installation, solid cleanup, and smooth final inspections. Still, there are complaints about debris left behind, follow-up issues, and work that did not match the agreed plan.Solar.com's composite of published customer feedback, not a customer quote

Professional installation results. Several reviewers describe the roofing and electrical work as professional, with crews handling the job cleanly and completing inspections smoothly. Representative review excerpt: "Everything went smoothly from the first site visit, installation and cleanup to the final inspections."

Cleanup and site issues. Some reviewers report debris or other site-care problems after installation and say extra follow-up was needed to get those items addressed. Representative review excerpt: "Cassy made me send pics of the nails and debris left all over the place when it was evident what needed cleaned up."

Work not matching the plan. A few reviews say the installation did not follow the planned scope, which led to additional frustration after the crew left. Representative review excerpt: "They are unresponsive and slow, they don't follow up, and did not install according to the plan."

Long-term support & performance

Long-Term Support5.0/10

Reviewers give mixed feedback after installation, with some saying production and post-install coordination met expectations, while many others describe support gaps once the system was supposed to be running. Complaints focus on delayed service, unclear support ownership, and trouble getting issues addressed after turn-on.Solar.com's composite of published customer feedback, not a customer quote

Post-install support problems. Many reviewers say they struggled to get service or repair help after installation, including repeated follow-up without resolution. Representative review excerpt: "A service appointment was scheduled for a site visit to repair the issue, and I rearranged my schedule to be available."

Unclear support responsibility. Some reviewers urge buyers to verify who is responsible for support because they felt the post-install process was not clearly handled. Representative review excerpt: "Before buying a home with GAF products installed, I would urge buyers to carefully verify that the system is fully functional, confirm exactly who is responsible for support, and get..."

Production and process can meet expectations. A smaller set of reviews says the work was professionally done and that production was meeting or exceeding expectations after completion. Representative review excerpt: "The process from signing the agreement to PTO is a long one, but the work was done professionally, and so far production is exceeding expectations."

Bottom line: Across the review set, GAF ENERGY draws the strongest criticism for communication, coordination, and timeline reliability, where reviewers frequently describe long delays and poor follow-through. Workmanship is viewed more favorably than the service-related categories, but post-install support and transparency around pricing or setup remain recurring concerns.

How this is built: category scores and summaries weigh the company's full published rating record (109 Google reviews averaging 2.0 stars), the most recent and most relevant review texts, and recurring feedback themes verified acrossGoogle and Yelp. Ratings and review excerpts from published review sources. Refreshed as new feedback is published. No installer can pay to change it.

About Gaf Energy

Company background from published business information and licensing records.

Also files CPUC records as: G A F Construction.

Products

Solar

Service area

California. Note: the install counts on this page cover California investor-owned-utility records only.

Work for this company or see something out of date? Profiles can be claimed and corrected: contact partners@solar.com. Placement on solar.com is never for sale.

Recorded installs by year

Residential interconnections statewide in PG&E, SCE, and SDG&E records through May 2026.
3
2019
34
'20
65
'21
91
'22
208
'23
210
'24
1989
'25
3349
'26

Important context: this chart shows investor-owned-utility records only. Companies that shift work toward municipal-utility territory (LADWP and city power departments) or other states will show declining bars here even while building steadily elsewhere, and 2025-26 records also lag real installation dates. Treat this as a partial window, not the company's full trajectory.

FAQ about Gaf Energy

What do customers say in Gaf Energy reviews?

We analyzed 104 substantive published customer reviews of Gaf Energy in full. The company's Solar.com Installer Score is 3.8/10, with category-level detail on this page covering sales integrity, price transparency, communication, timeline reliability, workmanship, and long-term support.

How many solar systems has Gaf Energy installed?

Gaf Energy appears as installer of record on 5,891+ residential systems in California investor-owned-utility interconnection records through May 2026. Work in municipal-utility territory or other states does not appear in those public records.

How can I compare Gaf Energy's pricing?

Run your address through solar.com to see direct bids from vetted installers competing for your project, with pricing locked online. If you have a qualified quote from any installer, our Best Price Guarantee means we match better qualified prices.

Get bids from installers competing through solar.com.

Run your address and see direct pricing in about two minutes. No sales call required.

How we built this data

Methodology: Counts are residential PV interconnections in investor-owned-utility territory (PG&E, SCE, SDG&E) per CPUC Rule 21 public records through May 2026. Postal and name variants are merged. Municipal utility territory such as LADWP, Glendale, Pasadena, Burbank, Anaheim, and Riverside Public Utilities is not included in those CPUC counts. Counts show recorded installations, not quality ratings. Reported costs are self-reported on owned-system interconnections. No installer can pay for placement.

Who we are: Solar.com is a solar marketplace — we connect homeowners with installers and earn a fee when projects move forward. These rankings and scores are computed from public installation records and published customer reviews. No installer can pay for placement, and no installer — including those we work with — can pay to change a score.