Best solar companies California Sunnova Energy

Sunnova Energy Reviews

Based in Irvine, CA. This profile is built from public installation records and published ratings, not paid placement.

16,017verified installs in California utility records*
2,089recent installs, 2025-26 records*
2014first year in county records
3.8/10Solar.com Score · 31 reviews analyzed

Solar.com Installer Score for Sunnova Energy

One score, computed the same way for every installer. We read the full text of all 31 substantive published Sunnova Energy review texts across every platform and measure what customers actually report. Not a survey. Not a sample. Never for sale.

Solar.com Installer Score

3.8/10

Blends the six category scores (70%) with the recency-weighted star record (30%).

Synthesized from 31 substantive customer review texts (32 published reviews collected).

Google 1.3★ · 32 reviews

Updated September 28, 2026 · No installer can pay to change this score · How scores work →

Read what customers actually say ↓
Review star recordRecency-weighted star ratings across platforms, converted to a 0-10 signal before it is blended into the headline Solar.com Score.2.5

recency-weighted star ratings across platforms

Sales IntegrityHow clearly and honestly the company explains the system, contract, savings, and incentives before you sign.5.1

4 reviews speak to this · 0 praise · 4 complaints

Price TransparencyHow well the final price, financing terms, and incentive guidance match what customers were led to expect.3.9

11 reviews speak to this · 0 praise · 11 complaints

CommunicationHow reliably the company keeps customers informed and answers questions across sales, installation, and service.2.9

25 reviews speak to this · 1 praise · 24 complaints

Timeline ReliabilityHow well the company manages the path from contract through permits, installation, inspection, and turn-on — without the customer having to chase it.3.9

12 reviews speak to this · 0 praise · 12 complaints

WorkmanshipThe quality, professionalism, neatness, and property care of the physical installation.5.0

5 reviews speak to this · 0 praise · 5 complaints

Long-Term SupportHow well the system performs after turn-on, how the company handles monitoring, warranty claims, and service calls — and its staying power to honor them.5.4

16 reviews speak to this · 0 praise · 16 complaints

#678 of 678 scored in California by Solar.com Installer Score

How does Sunnova Energy compare where you live? Rankings are local; an installer that leads one city can trail in the next. See how they rank in your city →

Why this differs from star ratings: most five-star reviews say “great company” and stop, and star averages reward that. These category scores only count reviews with concrete evidence, weighted by recency and the reviewer’s track record. A company can hold a strong star average while specific categories score lower; that gap is usually where the real story is. Categories with more complaints than praise are the questions worth asking any bidder, not necessarily dealbreakers.

Where Solar.com fits in

We score the installers. Then they compete for your roof.

Solar.com vets and scores every installer from public records and published reviews — then licensed installers bid on your actual roof. Real prices online, backed by the Best Price Guarantee. No sales calls, no pressure — you pick the winner.

See my price

Where Sunnova Energy builds

County-by-county activity from CPUC records through May 2026.

What this data covers: *Counts on this page, including the totals up top, come from investor-owned-utility interconnection records (SCE, SDG&E, PG&E). Work in municipal-utility territory, such as LADWP or city utilities, and outside California does not appear here, so this company's true totals are higher than shown. Unlike the county rankings, this profile also shows counties below the 250-install ranking floor.

CountyVerified installsRecent 2025-26Active sinceMedian system% leasedCounty rankingLink to the county ranking page. This company's rank on this page is its Solar.com Installer Score rank, shown above.
Riverside County6,47190420143.7 kW98.6%See county ranking →
San Bernardino County4,42935620213.6 kW98.2%See county ranking →
Los Angeles County2,03421520153.6 kW99.3%See county ranking →
Orange County1,53628620203.6 kW99.3%See county ranking →
Kings County3532920214.4 kW98.9%See county ranking →
Tulare County352520214.8 kW96.0%See county ranking →
Ventura County3383520203.6 kW97.3%See county ranking →
Kern County1929720203.8 kW89.6%below ranking floor (under 250 installs)
Fresno County1658920174.6 kW89.7%below ranking floor (under 250 installs)
San Joaquin County542920154.2 kW68.5%below ranking floor (under 250 installs)

% leased counts systems recorded as third party owned (lease or power purchase agreement); the remainder are customer owned. Median system size is the middle system this company installed in that county. Star ratings and review counts are from Google.

Sunnova Energy reviews: what customers say

An independent synthesis of published customer feedback, updated September 28, 2026. Green marks praise, amber mixed experiences, red complaints.

Sales & proposal integrity

Sales Integrity5.1/10

Reviewers most often describe problems with sales clarity and expectations. The main pattern is that proposal promises, savings claims, and follow-through on what was sold did not match what customers say they experienced.Solar.com's composite of published customer feedback, not a customer quote

Promises not reflected later. Reviewers say the sales message often did not line up with the final project experience, with some describing missed promises and confusion about what was included. Representative review excerpt: "Our project took nearly two years, cost us thousands of dollars more than quoted and they did not make good on any promises from the sales reps that they hired."

Savings claims disputed. Some reviewers report being told the system would eliminate their bill or create savings, but later felt those expectations were not met. Representative review excerpt: "They promised me that my SCE bill would be eliminated and that I would only be paying them, claiming I would actually save money."

Sales responsiveness vs. support. A recurring complaint is that responsiveness feels stronger during the sale than after the contract is signed, especially when customers need help with their system. Representative review excerpt: "They are quick to respond when they think a sale is to be completed but if you need help with your system they don’t want to be bothered."

Price & financing transparency

Price Transparency3.9/10

Reviewers largely report dissatisfaction with pricing, billing, and financing details. The complaints center on charges that differed from expectations, refund delays, and confusion tied to payments or incentive timing.Solar.com's composite of published customer feedback, not a customer quote

Unexpected higher costs. Several reviewers say the project ended up costing more than they were quoted, with some reporting charges they did not expect from the original agreement. Representative review excerpt: "Our project took nearly two years, cost us thousands of dollars more than quoted and they did not make good on any promises from the sales reps that they hired."

Billing and principal issues. Some customers describe problems getting billing corrections made, including concerns about how payments were applied and whether the contract matched what was charged. Representative review excerpt: "Finally spoke to someone in their billing department who advised me that a correction cannot be made to past payments applied to the principal."

Refund delays. Reviewers also report waiting for refunds or resolutions after being told items still needed internal approval. Representative review excerpt: "On July 16, I called again and was told it still needed “internal approval.” Almost a month later, no refund, no accountability, and no resolution."

Communication & coordination

Communication2.9/10

This is one of the weakest areas in the review set. Reviewers frequently describe slow responses, conflicting information, limited ownership of issues, and repeated follow-up calls to get updates or action.Solar.com's composite of published customer feedback, not a customer quote

Hard to get a clear answer. Reviewers say they often could not get a straight answer about project status, activation timing, or next steps, even after repeated contact. Representative review excerpt: "I called them and they couldn't give me an answer when my solar would be activated with Southern California Edison."

Conflicting information. A common theme is being passed between representatives and receiving different answers each time, which left customers feeling they had to keep calling. Representative review excerpt: "Since then, I’ve called so many times, spent hours on the phone, and have been given the runaround by different reps with conflicting info every time."

Support feels uneven. Some reviewers report that the company responded more quickly during the sales process than when customers needed help after the system was in place. Representative review excerpt: "They are quick to respond when they think a sale is to be completed but if you need help with your system they don’t want to be bothered."

Timeline reliability

Timeline Reliability3.9/10

Reviewers frequently describe long delays and missed timing commitments. The main issues involve delayed activation, appointments that did not happen, and slow movement on permitting or utility-related steps.Solar.com's composite of published customer feedback, not a customer quote

Activation delays. Some reviewers say they could not get a clear timeline for when their solar would be activated, even after multiple calls. Representative review excerpt: "I called them and they couldn't give me an answer when my solar would be activated with Southern California Edison."

Missed appointments. Customers also report confirmed appointments where no one arrived and no one contacted them to cancel or reschedule. Representative review excerpt: "I received an email confirming the June 19 appointment, but no one came, and no one contacted me to cancel or reschedule."

Applications not submitted promptly. Several reviewers describe waiting months only to learn that paperwork or applications had not yet been submitted. Representative review excerpt: "However, after waiting for three months, I called today and was told that they had not even submitted my application to SDGE yet."

Workmanship & site care

Workmanship5.0/10

Reviewers report mixed but mostly negative experiences with installation quality and site care. The complaints focus on damage, cleanup or repair issues, and situations where customers felt the company did not take responsibility quickly.Solar.com's composite of published customer feedback, not a customer quote

Property damage concerns. Some reviewers say installation work left damage to the home, including attic or roof-related issues that later needed attention. Representative review excerpt: "One of the most disgusting things they did was when they put holes in my attic vent and just plugged them with plastic, which led to mold growing throughout my..."

Repair responsibility disputes. A recurring complaint is that customers felt the company did not address reported damage promptly or reasonably after the work was done. Representative review excerpt: "Sunnova caused extensive damage to our house and has spent the better part 9 months trying to find a way not to address this issue reasonably."

Scheduling and site mistakes. Reviewers also mention missed scheduling details and follow-up problems tied to the installation visit itself. Representative review excerpt: "I asked for the $100 they would have charged me had I done this to them but they are of course not taking responsibility for confirming the wrong day."

Long-term support & performance

Long-Term Support5.4/10

Post-install feedback is mostly negative, with reviewers describing system issues, service delays, and difficulty getting help after turn-on. Complaints often center on broken equipment, limited repair access, and uncertainty about whether the system is working as expected.Solar.com's composite of published customer feedback, not a customer quote

Repair support is difficult to reach. Reviewers say they struggled to get service or repairs scheduled after installation, sometimes after repeated attempts. Representative review excerpt: "I have not had service since Oct 2024 and I can't get ahold of them to for repairs."

System or battery issues. Some customers report problems with batteries or other system components not working properly for extended periods. Representative review excerpt: "After moving into a brand new home that comes with solar panels and a battery, they have been unable to get a working battery for me and it's been 5..."

Post-install help feels limited. Several reviewers describe difficulty getting effective help once the system was already installed, especially when something on the system needed attention. Representative review excerpt: "I called customer service and "Anna" told me: "I know your system is broken, but we cannot give 3rd party access to your system to fix it, and we can't..."

Bottom line: Across 31 substantive Google reviews, Sunnova Energy’s profile trends negative overall, with especially weak marks for communication and coordination, timeline reliability, and post-install support. Reviewers most often describe delays, billing or price disputes, and difficulty getting clear answers or follow-through after the sale.

How this is built: category scores and summaries weigh the company's full published rating record (32 Google reviews averaging 1.3 stars), the most recent and most relevant review texts, and recurring feedback themes verified acrossGoogle. Ratings and review excerpts from published review sources. Refreshed as new feedback is published. No installer can pay to change it.

About Sunnova Energy

Company background from published business information and licensing records.

Also files CPUC records as: Sunnova.

Products

Solar

Service area

California. Note: the install counts on this page cover California investor-owned-utility records only.

Work for this company or see something out of date? Profiles can be claimed and corrected: contact partners@solar.com. Placement on solar.com is never for sale.

Recorded installs by year

Residential interconnections statewide in PG&E, SCE, and SDG&E records through May 2026.
3
2014
6
'15
2
'16
3
'17
11
'20
1452
'21
3601
'22
3491
'23
5421
'24
2093
'25
22
'26

Important context: this chart shows investor-owned-utility records only. Companies that shift work toward municipal-utility territory (LADWP and city power departments) or other states will show declining bars here even while building steadily elsewhere, and 2025-26 records also lag real installation dates. Treat this as a partial window, not the company's full trajectory.

FAQ about Sunnova Energy

What do customers say in Sunnova Energy reviews?

We analyzed 31 substantive published customer reviews of Sunnova Energy in full. The company's Solar.com Installer Score is 3.8/10, with category-level detail on this page covering sales integrity, price transparency, communication, timeline reliability, workmanship, and long-term support.

How many solar systems has Sunnova Energy installed?

Sunnova Energy appears as installer of record on 16,017+ residential systems in California investor-owned-utility interconnection records through May 2026. Work in municipal-utility territory or other states does not appear in those public records.

How can I compare Sunnova Energy's pricing?

Run your address through solar.com to see direct bids from vetted installers competing for your project, with pricing locked online. If you have a qualified quote from any installer, our Best Price Guarantee means we match better qualified prices.

Get bids from installers competing through solar.com.

Run your address and see direct pricing in about two minutes. No sales call required.

How we built this data

Methodology: Counts are residential PV interconnections in investor-owned-utility territory (PG&E, SCE, SDG&E) per CPUC Rule 21 public records through May 2026. Postal and name variants are merged. Municipal utility territory such as LADWP, Glendale, Pasadena, Burbank, Anaheim, and Riverside Public Utilities is not included in those CPUC counts. Counts show recorded installations, not quality ratings. Reported costs are self-reported on owned-system interconnections. No installer can pay for placement.

Who we are: Solar.com is a solar marketplace — we connect homeowners with installers and earn a fee when projects move forward. These rankings and scores are computed from public installation records and published customer reviews. No installer can pay for placement, and no installer — including those we work with — can pay to change a score.