Best solar companies California Placer County Newcastle
Verified Newcastle installs, review-backed Solar.com Scores, and the broader county market in one place. Public data, not paid placement.
What this data covers: counts come from investor-owned-utility interconnection records for Newcastle service addresses. Homes served by municipal utilities interconnect through their city utility instead and do not appear here. Companies with fewer than 10 recorded local installs are not listed; many also build across Placer County and beyond. See the full Placer County ranking →
| # | Installer | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Magic Sun Solar2 recent installs44 verifiedActive since 20130.0% leased | 2 | 44 | 2013 | 0.0% | 8.7 | Get a direct bid | |
| 2 | Capital City Solar Electric2 recent installs10 verifiedActive since 201310.0% leased | 2 | 10 | 2013 | 10.0% | 8.4 | Get a direct bid | |
| 3 | Senga Energy0 recent installs10 verifiedActive since 202150.0% leased | 0 | 10 | 2021 | 50.0% | 8.4 | Get a direct bid | |
| 4 | Es Electrical Construction4 recent installs41 verifiedActive since 20100.0% leased | 4 | 41 | 2010 | 0.0% | 8.1 | Get a direct bid | |
| 5 | Velocity Solar Power3 recent installs14 verifiedActive since 20190.0% leased | 3 | 14 | 2019 | 0.0% | 8.0 | Get a direct bid | |
| 6 | Hooked On Solar1 recent installs32 verifiedActive since 201621.9% leased | 1 | 32 | 2016 | 21.9% | 7.5 | Get a direct bid | |
| 7 | Solar Savings Direct1 recent installs12 verifiedActive since 20210.0% leased | 1 | 12 | 2021 | 0.0% | 7.3 | Get a direct bid | |
| 8 | Energy Saving Pros0 recent installs56 verifiedActive since 20130.0% leased | 0 | 56 | 2013 | 0.0% | 7.3 | Get a direct bid | |
| 9 | Sunrun6 recent installs61 verifiedActive since 201478.7% leased | 6 | 61 | 2014 | 78.7% | 6.9 | Get a direct bid | |
| 10 | Sierra Pacfic Home & Comfort2 recent installs22 verifiedActive since 20060.0% leased | 2 | 22 | 2006 | 0.0% | 6.5 | Get a direct bid | |
| 11 | Tesla Energy5 recent installs57 verifiedActive since 201119.3% leased | 5 | 57 | 2011 | 19.3% | 5.5 | Get a direct bid | |
| 12 | Infinity Energy0 recent installs14 verifiedActive since 201814.3% leased | 0 | 14 | 2018 | 14.3% | 5.3 | Get a direct bid | |
| 13 | SunPower Corporation0 recent installs10 verifiedActive since 20200.0% leased | 0 | 10 | 2020 | 0.0% | 5.1 | Get a direct bid | |
| 14 | V3 Electric3 recent installs27 verifiedActive since 201574.1% leased | 3 | 27 | 2015 | 74.1% | 5.0 | Get a direct bid | |
| 15 | Sunworks0 recent installs28 verifiedActive since 20130.0% leased | 0 | 28 | 2013 | 0.0% | 4.9 | Get a direct bid | |
| — | Building Energy & Power Solutions9 recent installs11 verifiedActive since 20230.0% leased | 9 | 11 | 2023 | 0.0% | Not yet scored | Get a direct bid | |
| — | Matson-services0 recent installs16 verifiedActive since 20090.0% leased | 0 | 16 | 2009 | 0.0% | Not yet scored | Get a direct bid | |
| — | California Solar Electric0 recent installs14 verifiedActive since 20070.0% leased | 0 | 14 | 2007 | 0.0% | Not yet scored | Get a direct bid | |
| — | Petersendean0 recent installs14 verifiedActive since 20140.0% leased | 0 | 14 | 2014 | 0.0% | Not yet scored | Get a direct bid | |
| — | Brower Mechanical0 recent installs10 verifiedActive since 201410.0% leased | 0 | 10 | 2014 | 10.0% | Not yet scored | Get a direct bid |
Solar.com Scores are live for 15 of the 20 listed companies. Companies marked “Not yet scored” have fewer than 20 analyzed review texts or are still being analyzed; scores appear as each company's full review record is processed. Select up to 4 companies to compare them category by category.
% leased counts systems recorded as third party owned, meaning a lease or power purchase agreement. The remainder are customer owned. Active installer counts include every company that filed an interconnection that year, down to small and occasional operations. Counts come from PG&E, SCE, and SDG&E interconnection records; homes served by municipal utilities like LADWP, SMUD, and city power departments interconnect through their local utility instead, so companies focused on those territories show fewer records here. The Solar.com Score is computed from the full text of each company's published customer reviews (star ratings and review counts sourced from Google and Yelp), plus verified public-record track record; it drives the default ranking for scored companies and is never for sale.
Run your address and see direct pricing for Newcastle in about two minutes. No sales call required.
The table ranks scored companies by Solar.com Score, computed from customer review evidence and verified track record; 15 companies in this city currently carry a score. Companies not yet scored remain visible below the scored cohort by recent Newcastle install activity. The best company for your home also depends on your roof, utility, and bid, which is why the same companies compete on price through solar.com.
Companies with enough review evidence are ranked by Solar.com Score. Not-yet-scored companies show a dash in the rank column and sit below them, ordered by recent 2025-26 installation activity recorded for Newcastle addresses in CPUC interconnection records. No company can pay for placement.
Where a company clears the 20 analyzed-review floor, its Solar.com Score summarizes substantive customer review texts, weighted by reviewer credibility and recency. Select companies in the table to compare their review scores category by category, from sales integrity to long-term support.
Run your address through solar.com. Vetted installers compete on one identical scope for your home, pricing is locked online, and the Best Price Guarantee backs the winning number in writing.
Methodology: Counts are residential PV interconnections in investor-owned-utility territory (PG&E, SCE, SDG&E) per CPUC Rule 21 public records through May 2026. Postal and name variants are merged. Municipal utility territory such as LADWP, Glendale, Pasadena, Burbank, Anaheim, and Riverside Public Utilities is not included in those CPUC counts. Counts show recorded installations, not quality ratings. Reported costs are self-reported on owned-system interconnections. No installer can pay for placement.
Who we are: Solar.com is a solar marketplace — we connect homeowners with installers and earn a fee when projects move forward. These rankings and scores are computed from public installation records and published customer reviews. No installer can pay for placement, and no installer — including those we work with — can pay to change a score.