Best solar companies California Fresno County Kingsburg
Verified Kingsburg installs, review-backed Solar.com Scores, and the broader county market in one place. Public data, not paid placement.
What this data covers: counts come from investor-owned-utility interconnection records for Kingsburg service addresses. Homes served by municipal utilities interconnect through their city utility instead and do not appear here. Companies with fewer than 10 recorded local installs are not listed; many also build across Fresno County and beyond. See the full Fresno County ranking →
| # | Installer | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nova West Solar0 recent installs11 verifiedActive since 20090.0% leased | 0 | 11 | 2009 | 0.0% | 8.5 | Get a direct bid | |
| 2 | Energy Concepts Enterprises1 recent installs75 verifiedActive since 20155.3% leased | 1 | 75 | 2015 | 5.3% | 8.4 | Get a direct bid | |
| 3 | Citadel Roofing And Solar60 recent installs115 verifiedActive since 20230.0% leased | 60 | 115 | 2023 | 0.0% | 8.4 | Get a direct bid | |
| 4 | Evans Energy7 recent installs40 verifiedActive since 20180.0% leased | 7 | 40 | 2018 | 0.0% | 8.0 | Get a direct bid | |
| 5 | Jp Electrical Solar0 recent installs11 verifiedActive since 202018.2% leased | 0 | 11 | 2020 | 18.2% | 7.9 | Get a direct bid | |
| 6 | Dick Donald P Air Conditioning0 recent installs64 verifiedActive since 20200.0% leased | 0 | 64 | 2020 | 0.0% | 7.9 | Get a direct bid | |
| 7 | Solar Negotiators10 recent installs63 verifiedActive since 20181.6% leased | 10 | 63 | 2018 | 1.6% | 7.4 | Get a direct bid | |
| 8 | Sun Solar Energy Solutions0 recent installs13 verifiedActive since 201523.1% leased | 0 | 13 | 2015 | 23.1% | 7.1 | Get a direct bid | |
| 9 | Sunrun57 recent installs438 verifiedActive since 201479.9% leased | 57 | 438 | 2014 | 79.9% | 6.9 | Get a direct bid | |
| 10 | Lift Energy Construction0 recent installs22 verifiedActive since 202059.1% leased | 0 | 22 | 2020 | 59.1% | 6.9 | Get a direct bid | |
| 11 | Empower Electric Solar3 recent installs24 verifiedActive since 20190.0% leased | 3 | 24 | 2019 | 0.0% | 6.8 | Get a direct bid | |
| 12 | Lifestyle Solar3 recent installs111 verifiedActive since 201586.5% leased | 3 | 111 | 2015 | 86.5% | 6.2 | Get a direct bid | |
| 13 | Tesla Energy2 recent installs131 verifiedActive since 200937.4% leased | 2 | 131 | 2009 | 37.4% | 5.5 | Get a direct bid | |
| 14 | Infinity Energy0 recent installs16 verifiedActive since 201625.0% leased | 0 | 16 | 2016 | 25.0% | 5.3 | Get a direct bid | |
| 15 | 1ST Light Energy0 recent installs10 verifiedActive since 20080.0% leased | 0 | 10 | 2008 | 0.0% | 4.8 | Get a direct bid | |
| 16 | Leonard Roofing0 recent installs18 verifiedActive since 201783.3% leased | 0 | 18 | 2017 | 83.3% | 4.7 | Get a direct bid | |
| 17 | Freedom Forever4 recent installs33 verifiedActive since 201945.5% leased | 4 | 33 | 2019 | 45.5% | 4.3 | Get a direct bid | |
| — | Bright Planet3 recent installs20 verifiedActive since 202240.0% leased | 3 | 20 | 2022 | 40.0% | Not yet scored | Get a direct bid | |
| — | Quality Homes Services2 recent installs50 verifiedActive since 201528.0% leased | 2 | 50 | 2015 | 28.0% | Not yet scored | Get a direct bid | |
| — | Connect Solar & Electric0 recent installs46 verifiedActive since 20130.0% leased | 0 | 46 | 2013 | 0.0% | Not yet scored | Get a direct bid |
Solar.com Scores are live for 17 of the 28 listed companies. Companies marked “Not yet scored” have fewer than 20 analyzed review texts or are still being analyzed; scores appear as each company's full review record is processed. Select up to 4 companies to compare them category by category.
% leased counts systems recorded as third party owned, meaning a lease or power purchase agreement. The remainder are customer owned. Active installer counts include every company that filed an interconnection that year, down to small and occasional operations. Counts come from PG&E, SCE, and SDG&E interconnection records; homes served by municipal utilities like LADWP, SMUD, and city power departments interconnect through their local utility instead, so companies focused on those territories show fewer records here. The Solar.com Score is computed from the full text of each company's published customer reviews (star ratings and review counts sourced from Google and Yelp), plus verified public-record track record; it drives the default ranking for scored companies and is never for sale.
Run your address and see direct pricing for Kingsburg in about two minutes. No sales call required.
The table ranks scored companies by Solar.com Score, computed from customer review evidence and verified track record; 17 companies in this city currently carry a score. Companies not yet scored remain visible below the scored cohort by recent Kingsburg install activity. The best company for your home also depends on your roof, utility, and bid, which is why the same companies compete on price through solar.com.
Companies with enough review evidence are ranked by Solar.com Score. Not-yet-scored companies show a dash in the rank column and sit below them, ordered by recent 2025-26 installation activity recorded for Kingsburg addresses in CPUC interconnection records. No company can pay for placement.
Where a company clears the 20 analyzed-review floor, its Solar.com Score summarizes substantive customer review texts, weighted by reviewer credibility and recency. Select companies in the table to compare their review scores category by category, from sales integrity to long-term support.
Run your address through solar.com. Vetted installers compete on one identical scope for your home, pricing is locked online, and the Best Price Guarantee backs the winning number in writing.
Methodology: Counts are residential PV interconnections in investor-owned-utility territory (PG&E, SCE, SDG&E) per CPUC Rule 21 public records through May 2026. Postal and name variants are merged. Municipal utility territory such as LADWP, Glendale, Pasadena, Burbank, Anaheim, and Riverside Public Utilities is not included in those CPUC counts. Counts show recorded installations, not quality ratings. Reported costs are self-reported on owned-system interconnections. No installer can pay for placement.
Who we are: Solar.com is a solar marketplace — we connect homeowners with installers and earn a fee when projects move forward. These rankings and scores are computed from public installation records and published customer reviews. No installer can pay for placement, and no installer — including those we work with — can pay to change a score.