Best solar companies California Fresno County Kerman
Verified Kerman installs, review-backed Solar.com Scores, and the broader county market in one place. Public data, not paid placement.
What this data covers: counts come from investor-owned-utility interconnection records for Kerman service addresses. Homes served by municipal utilities interconnect through their city utility instead and do not appear here. Companies with fewer than 10 recorded local installs are not listed; many also build across Fresno County and beyond. See the full Fresno County ranking →
| # | Installer | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Energy Concepts Enterprises1 recent installs33 verifiedActive since 201415.1% leased | 1 | 33 | 2014 | 15.1% | 8.4 | Get a direct bid | |
| 2 | American Array Solar Electric0 recent installs27 verifiedActive since 20160.0% leased | 0 | 27 | 2016 | 0.0% | 8.0 | Get a direct bid | |
| 3 | Valley Solar0 recent installs11 verifiedActive since 20170.0% leased | 0 | 11 | 2017 | 0.0% | 7.9 | Get a direct bid | |
| 4 | Grid Alternatives1 recent installs29 verifiedActive since 201269.0% leased | 1 | 29 | 2012 | 69.0% | 7.8 | Get a direct bid | |
| 5 | Turnkey Construction And Solar0 recent installs118 verifiedActive since 20200.0% leased | 0 | 118 | 2020 | 0.0% | 7.6 | Get a direct bid | |
| 6 | Solar Negotiators14 recent installs75 verifiedActive since 20181.4% leased | 14 | 75 | 2018 | 1.4% | 7.4 | Get a direct bid | |
| 7 | Nexus Energy Systems0 recent installs12 verifiedActive since 201566.7% leased | 0 | 12 | 2015 | 66.7% | 7.3 | Get a direct bid | |
| 8 | Sun Solar Energy Solutions0 recent installs10 verifiedActive since 201620.0% leased | 0 | 10 | 2016 | 20.0% | 7.1 | Get a direct bid | |
| 9 | Sunrun60 recent installs444 verifiedActive since 201471.2% leased | 60 | 444 | 2014 | 71.2% | 6.9 | Get a direct bid | |
| 10 | Lift Energy Construction0 recent installs25 verifiedActive since 202048.0% leased | 0 | 25 | 2020 | 48.0% | 6.9 | Get a direct bid | |
| 11 | Empower Electric Solar12 recent installs53 verifiedActive since 20200.0% leased | 12 | 53 | 2020 | 0.0% | 6.8 | Get a direct bid | |
| 12 | Kota Construction0 recent installs13 verifiedActive since 20210.0% leased | 0 | 13 | 2021 | 0.0% | 6.5 | Get a direct bid | |
| 13 | Sol Nova Electric0 recent installs10 verifiedActive since 202250.0% leased | 0 | 10 | 2022 | 50.0% | 6.4 | Get a direct bid | |
| 14 | Tesla Energy8 recent installs143 verifiedActive since 200951.0% leased | 8 | 143 | 2009 | 51.0% | 5.5 | Get a direct bid | |
| 15 | Infinity Energy0 recent installs19 verifiedActive since 201631.6% leased | 0 | 19 | 2016 | 31.6% | 5.3 | Get a direct bid | |
| 16 | SunPower Corporation0 recent installs126 verifiedActive since 201864.3% leased | 0 | 126 | 2018 | 64.3% | 5.1 | Get a direct bid | |
| 17 | Freedom Forever62 recent installs105 verifiedActive since 201820.0% leased | 62 | 105 | 2018 | 20.0% | 4.3 | Get a direct bid | |
| — | Bright Planet3 recent installs28 verifiedActive since 202060.8% leased | 3 | 28 | 2020 | 60.8% | Not yet scored | Get a direct bid | |
| — | Quality Homes Services1 recent installs24 verifiedActive since 20164.2% leased | 1 | 24 | 2016 | 4.2% | Not yet scored | Get a direct bid | |
| — | Rakkar Development & Construction1 recent installs14 verifiedActive since 20190.0% leased | 1 | 14 | 2019 | 0.0% | Not yet scored | Get a direct bid |
Solar.com Scores are live for 17 of the 27 listed companies. Companies marked “Not yet scored” have fewer than 20 analyzed review texts or are still being analyzed; scores appear as each company's full review record is processed. Select up to 4 companies to compare them category by category.
% leased counts systems recorded as third party owned, meaning a lease or power purchase agreement. The remainder are customer owned. Active installer counts include every company that filed an interconnection that year, down to small and occasional operations. Counts come from PG&E, SCE, and SDG&E interconnection records; homes served by municipal utilities like LADWP, SMUD, and city power departments interconnect through their local utility instead, so companies focused on those territories show fewer records here. The Solar.com Score is computed from the full text of each company's published customer reviews (star ratings and review counts sourced from Google and Yelp), plus verified public-record track record; it drives the default ranking for scored companies and is never for sale.
Run your address and see direct pricing for Kerman in about two minutes. No sales call required.
The table ranks scored companies by Solar.com Score, computed from customer review evidence and verified track record; 17 companies in this city currently carry a score. Companies not yet scored remain visible below the scored cohort by recent Kerman install activity. The best company for your home also depends on your roof, utility, and bid, which is why the same companies compete on price through solar.com.
Companies with enough review evidence are ranked by Solar.com Score. Not-yet-scored companies show a dash in the rank column and sit below them, ordered by recent 2025-26 installation activity recorded for Kerman addresses in CPUC interconnection records. No company can pay for placement.
Where a company clears the 20 analyzed-review floor, its Solar.com Score summarizes substantive customer review texts, weighted by reviewer credibility and recency. Select companies in the table to compare their review scores category by category, from sales integrity to long-term support.
Run your address through solar.com. Vetted installers compete on one identical scope for your home, pricing is locked online, and the Best Price Guarantee backs the winning number in writing.
Methodology: Counts are residential PV interconnections in investor-owned-utility territory (PG&E, SCE, SDG&E) per CPUC Rule 21 public records through May 2026. Postal and name variants are merged. Municipal utility territory such as LADWP, Glendale, Pasadena, Burbank, Anaheim, and Riverside Public Utilities is not included in those CPUC counts. Counts show recorded installations, not quality ratings. Reported costs are self-reported on owned-system interconnections. No installer can pay for placement.
Who we are: Solar.com is a solar marketplace — we connect homeowners with installers and earn a fee when projects move forward. These rankings and scores are computed from public installation records and published customer reviews. No installer can pay for placement, and no installer — including those we work with — can pay to change a score.