Page 175 | Solar.com

Please enter a valid zip code.

EV Charging Everywhere: An Interview with Heather Hochrein, EVmatch CEO

By Charging Your EV With Solar Panels No Comments

We sat down with Heather Hochrein, CEO and co-founder of EVmatch, to learn more about her Santa Barbara company and the opportunity of EV charging networks.

Through EVmatch, EV drivers leverage the sharing economy to easily find nearby, affordable charging, while station owners generate earnings by renting out their home charging infrastructure. EVmatch empowers a new generation of EV owners by providing a reliable and convenient charging solution to those lacking dedicated charging access, such as renters and multi-unit dwellers.

Kyle: Let’s start with a brief history of EVmatch. What inspired you to build an EV charging network?

Heather: EVmatch grew out of a deep passion for the environment and the desire to drive widespread adoption of cleaner electric vehicles. The concept for EVmatch started as a group Master’s thesis project at the University of California, Santa Barbara. My team and I identified electric vehicles as an important solution to reducing greenhouse gas emissions and local air pollutants, but also EV charging as a major barrier to adoption. After extensive customer discovery and market research, the idea for EVmatch was born!

Through a simple sharing application, we found we could leverage the rapidly growing private charging resources to support those without home charging access. We launched the EVmatch service in the spring of 2017 and have been steadily growing the network ever since.

EVmatch.png

What problems are there with our current charging infrastructure? How is EVmatch providing solutions to these issues?

Most people currently charge their EVs at home because that’s where it’s most convenient and affordable. Many EV drivers install a Level 2 (240V) charger at home to ensure their EV can be fully charged overnight. However, this is not an option for many people who live in apartments or don’t have off-street parking.

These drivers must rely entirely on either workplace or public charging, which present several challenges. There are simply not enough charging stations, they’re not reservable, and they’re often too expensive for routine charging. EVmatch takes a fundamentally different approach by applying the sharing economy to EV charging.

EVmatch dramatically increases the number of charging options by bringing private charging options into the public sphere. Additionally, all EVmatch stations are reservable in advance so drivers can rest assured that they’ll never be left without a charge.

Is it accurate to call EVmatch “the Airbnb of EV charging?”

Yes! EVmatch is very similar to Airbnb in the sense that people are renting out their home chargers to the public through a streamlined application. While EVmatch has no direct relationship with Airbnb, the concept is extremely similar. Like Airbnb, we’re also focused on creating a community. The EVmatch community is built around trust, shared resources, and adoption of clean technology.

With just a few quick clicks, EV drivers can list their home charging station or register for an account to rent private chargers. By bringing these groups together, EVmatch helps to charge hosts increase their return on investment in charging infrastructure and EV drivers instantly access more charging options- a win-win for everyone!

What are the biggest myths out there about EV charging? Do you think consumers have a proper understanding of what it’s like to own an EV?

There are many misconceptions about EVs and EV charging. As with any new technology, there is a lot of education required to ensure that customers can make informed purchasing decisions. Unfortunately, many car dealerships are not well equipped to sell EVs and often provide misinformation.

One big myth is that all EVs can use fast charging networks, such as Tesla’s Supercharger network or EVgo’s DC fast charger network. This is simply not true. No plug-in hybrids (e.g. Chevy Volt or Prius Prime) can use these high powered stations and many pure battery electric vehicles require an add-on at the time of purchase to access fast chargers. And of course, only Tesla vehicles can access their exclusive Supercharger network.

Another myth is that we can simply replicate the gas station model in order to meet EV charging needs. What many people don’t consider is that charging a battery takes much longer than filling a tank with gas – typically hours versus minutes. Therefore, EVs should really be charging any time they’re not in use, much like the way we charge other electronics.

Fast charging is fantastic for enabling long-distance travel in EVs but is not optimal for everyday charging due to high costs and negative impacts on both the electrical grid and EV battery life. This is why EV charging near “long-dwell” locations, such as home or work, is so important.

EVmatch_HeatherandShannon.jpgHeather and Shannon, co-founders of EVmatch (Image provided by EVmatch)

What are the biggest challenges to widespread adoption of a peer-to-peer charging network?

One of the biggest challenges is reaching customers who are considering buying an EV but might opt out due to limited charging access. These are our primary customers and we want to reach them before they choose to forgo an EV for a gas car. Given the long buying cycle for car purchases, it’s critical to reach these customers before they finalize their decision.

Another challenge is matching the EV charging supply and demand spatially. This requires highly targeted marketing in order to recruit charging hosts where our drivers need them most.

Where do you see EV ownership and EV charging going in the next 5 years? Do you think this will be affected by the simultaneous rise of autonomous vehicles?

I expect both EV sales and charging infrastructure to grow exponentially in the next five years. This will largely be driven by the decreasing costs and the increasing availability of EVs. A number of automakers recently committed to dramatically increase the number and type of electric models they produce, and I suspect this is just the beginning. For example, this year General Motors committed to producing at least 20 new all-electric vehicles by 2023. With a wider range of prices, styles, and classes, there will be an EV to suit everyone’s needs.

Vehicle automation will certainly drive EV adoption, especially when used in shared fleets as point-to-point on-demand cars. Given the high upfront and low operating costs of EVs, their economics make much more sense in a shared-use scenario. In the future, I believe cars will be shared, autonomous, and electric. Will that happens in 5 years? We’ll have to wait to see.

Do a lot of your users have home solar to offset their EV charging expenses?

Yes! Many of our hosts have rooftop solar to both powers their homes and their EVs. Adding an EV to a home can add significant energy demand and expense if charged regularly. It’s not uncommon for people’s electricity bills to nearly double when they add this new “major appliance” to their homes. Solar can dramatically lower these added costs. In many cases, buying an EV makes the economics of going solar pencil out when they didn’t previously.

For anyone who plans to regularly charge their EV at home, I’d highly recommend considering solar. In addition to the personal savings, EVmatch will soon designate “solar hosts” on our map to increase traffic to this listing and help more of our customers drive on sunshine!

Will the Solar Trade War Impact Home Solar?

By Solar Panel Installation Cost No Comments

The solar industry waits with breath abated. If approved by President Trump, the effects of the potential tariffs recommended by the United States ITC (International Trade Commission) will be far-reaching. Solar panel manufacturers and thousands of ancillary companies will be affected.

Suniva and SolarWorld Starting the Trade War

Here’s a quick catch-up. On April 26, 2017, solar module manufacturing company Suniva submitted a 201 filing to the ITC requesting tariffs on solar panel imports. SolarWorld joined on May 25, 2017.

Suniva and SolarWorld cite artificially inexpensive foreign imports of solar modules for their financial strain, including Suniva’s recent bankruptcy filing. But many in the industry say poor management is the reason these companies fail to thrive in the booming U.S. solar economy.

On October 31, 2017, the ITC recommended tariffs. Though they were less than the petitioned rates, many in the industry still foresee a significant negative impact on the U.S. solar sector if adopted.

Stakeholders will present their final arguments to U.S. trade representatives on December 6th, 2017. Following that, President Trump must make the final decision before January 13, 2018.

Potential Effects of Tariffs on Solar

Solar energy has been nearing grid parity as the number one new source of U.S. electricity generation, and the second least expensive means of generation. Residential solar has benefited from less expensive solar modules. Cheaper solar panels have lowered the cost of solar installations significantly in recent years, and have increased demand.

Solar’s strong economic strides have also helped downstream companies such as solar mounting equipment manufacturers and suppliers. They also stand to lose a lot if the tariffs increase the cost of solar. 27 such companies sent a letter to the ITC expressing their opposition to the 201 trade case.

SEIA estimated the tariffs could potentially double the cost of solar and cause the loss of 84,000 jobs.

Picking Sides in the Solar Trade War

While a majority of the industry agrees that the tariffs would be an unfair disadvantage for the solar industry as a whole, there are outliers. First Solar, the largest U.S.-based solar panel manufacturer, broke their silence in October supporting the 201 tariffs.  

While First Solar and similar manufacturers stand to benefit from the tariffs as producers of exempt solar modules, the argument seems to be the validity of keeping blue collar jobs stateside. However, it’s an incredibly complex issue.

The question becomes whether or not the health of selected companies justifies the potential demise of exponentially more within the industry. Potentially, this economic favoritism could be detrimental for the broader solar economy, and for new American jobs in general.

A statement from SEIA noted, “The solar industry is growing 17 times faster than the rest of the economy. Solar jobs last year grew 25 percent — contributing 1 out of every 50 new jobs created in the U.S., and the industry has added more than 100,000 blue-collar jobs to the economy in the last five years.”

What the Potential Tariffs Mean for Home Solar

While the general consensus seems to be that the tariffs could be damaging for the solar industry overall, GreenTech Media offers some good news for home solar companies in a recent analysis.

“The biggest impacts would be in the utility-scale solar sector, which is most sensitive to price increases, while the residential sector would be the most resilient.

What the Future Holds for Home Solar

Now the future of solar rests firmly on the desk of President Trump. He could potentially approve one of the ITC recommendations, propose an alternative, or do nothing.

At this point, it’s a wait-and-see situation. We’re hopeful that home solar will stay strong whatever the outcome. Solar has overcome many obstacles throughout the decades, and we’re confident that ingenuity will continue to prevail.

With the advantages that residential solar offers homeowners and the momentum over the past several years, we don’t see progress slowing down anytime soon.

What are your thoughts on the solar trade war? Will solar tariffs help or hurt the U.S. job market? Let us know in the comments below.