Best solar companies California Contra Costa County Pittsburg
Verified Pittsburg installs, review-backed Solar.com Scores, and the broader county market in one place. Public data, not paid placement.
What this data covers: counts come from investor-owned-utility interconnection records for Pittsburg service addresses. Homes served by municipal utilities interconnect through their city utility instead and do not appear here. Companies with fewer than 10 recorded local installs are not listed; many also build across Contra Costa County and beyond. See the full Contra Costa County ranking →
| # | Installer | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ambrose Solar4 recent installs26 verifiedActive since 20200.0% leased | 4 | 26 | 2020 | 0.0% | 8.8 | Get a direct bid | |
| 2 | Sol R Us Electrical3 recent installs26 verifiedActive since 20170.0% leased | 3 | 26 | 2017 | 0.0% | 8.7 | Get a direct bid | |
| 3 | West Coast Solar3 recent installs61 verifiedActive since 20120.0% leased | 3 | 61 | 2012 | 0.0% | 8.6 | Get a direct bid | |
| 4 | United Solar Electric2 recent installs13 verifiedActive since 20190.0% leased | 2 | 13 | 2019 | 0.0% | 8.4 | Get a direct bid | |
| 5 | Citadel Roofing And Solar41 recent installs144 verifiedActive since 20210.0% leased | 41 | 144 | 2021 | 0.0% | 8.4 | Get a direct bid | |
| 6 | Clear Day Energy0 recent installs11 verifiedActive since 20190.0% leased | 0 | 11 | 2019 | 0.0% | 8.2 | Get a direct bid | |
| 7 | Solar Optimum Design & Electrical2 recent installs17 verifiedActive since 20200.0% leased | 2 | 17 | 2020 | 0.0% | 8.2 | Get a direct bid | |
| 8 | Element Power Systems0 recent installs10 verifiedActive since 20160.0% leased | 0 | 10 | 2016 | 0.0% | 8.1 | Get a direct bid | |
| 9 | Powur Home Construction0 recent installs17 verifiedActive since 20225.9% leased | 0 | 17 | 2022 | 5.9% | 8.0 | Get a direct bid | |
| 10 | American Array Solar Electric1 recent installs129 verifiedActive since 20150.0% leased | 1 | 129 | 2015 | 0.0% | 8.0 | Get a direct bid | |
| 11 | Diablo Solar Services0 recent installs16 verifiedActive since 20040.0% leased | 0 | 16 | 2004 | 0.0% | 7.9 | Get a direct bid | |
| 12 | Grid Alternatives10 recent installs110 verifiedActive since 200973.6% leased | 10 | 110 | 2009 | 73.6% | 7.8 | Get a direct bid | |
| 13 | North Valley16 recent installs30 verifiedActive since 202396.7% leased | 16 | 30 | 2023 | 96.7% | 7.8 | Get a direct bid | |
| 14 | Synergy 7680 recent installs12 verifiedActive since 201516.7% leased | 0 | 12 | 2015 | 16.7% | 7.6 | Get a direct bid | |
| 15 | Hooked On Solar0 recent installs35 verifiedActive since 20160.0% leased | 0 | 35 | 2016 | 0.0% | 7.5 | Get a direct bid | |
| 16 | Nrg Clean Power3 recent installs20 verifiedActive since 20160.0% leased | 3 | 20 | 2016 | 0.0% | 7.4 | Get a direct bid | |
| 17 | Semper Solaris8 recent installs63 verifiedActive since 20159.5% leased | 8 | 63 | 2015 | 9.5% | 7.4 | Get a direct bid | |
| 18 | Solar Savings Direct0 recent installs24 verifiedActive since 20200.0% leased | 0 | 24 | 2020 | 0.0% | 7.3 | Get a direct bid | |
| 19 | Nexus Energy Systems1 recent installs21 verifiedActive since 20170.0% leased | 1 | 21 | 2017 | 0.0% | 7.3 | Get a direct bid | |
| 20 | Southwest Sun Solar0 recent installs11 verifiedActive since 201690.9% leased | 0 | 11 | 2016 | 90.9% | 7.1 | Get a direct bid |
Solar.com Scores are live for 33 of the 52 listed companies. Companies marked “Not yet scored” have fewer than 20 analyzed review texts or are still being analyzed; scores appear as each company's full review record is processed. Select up to 4 companies to compare them category by category.
% leased counts systems recorded as third party owned, meaning a lease or power purchase agreement. The remainder are customer owned. Active installer counts include every company that filed an interconnection that year, down to small and occasional operations. Counts come from PG&E, SCE, and SDG&E interconnection records; homes served by municipal utilities like LADWP, SMUD, and city power departments interconnect through their local utility instead, so companies focused on those territories show fewer records here. The Solar.com Score is computed from the full text of each company's published customer reviews (star ratings and review counts sourced from Google and Yelp), plus verified public-record track record; it drives the default ranking for scored companies and is never for sale.
Run your address and see direct pricing for Pittsburg in about two minutes. No sales call required.
The table ranks scored companies by Solar.com Score, computed from customer review evidence and verified track record; 33 companies in this city currently carry a score. Companies not yet scored remain visible below the scored cohort by recent Pittsburg install activity. The best company for your home also depends on your roof, utility, and bid, which is why the same companies compete on price through solar.com.
Companies with enough review evidence are ranked by Solar.com Score. Not-yet-scored companies show a dash in the rank column and sit below them, ordered by recent 2025-26 installation activity recorded for Pittsburg addresses in CPUC interconnection records. No company can pay for placement.
Where a company clears the 20 analyzed-review floor, its Solar.com Score summarizes substantive customer review texts, weighted by reviewer credibility and recency. Select companies in the table to compare their review scores category by category, from sales integrity to long-term support.
Run your address through solar.com. Vetted installers compete on one identical scope for your home, pricing is locked online, and the Best Price Guarantee backs the winning number in writing.
Methodology: Counts are residential PV interconnections in investor-owned-utility territory (PG&E, SCE, SDG&E) per CPUC Rule 21 public records through May 2026. Postal and name variants are merged. Municipal utility territory such as LADWP, Glendale, Pasadena, Burbank, Anaheim, and Riverside Public Utilities is not included in those CPUC counts. Counts show recorded installations, not quality ratings. Reported costs are self-reported on owned-system interconnections. No installer can pay for placement.
Who we are: Solar.com is a solar marketplace — we connect homeowners with installers and earn a fee when projects move forward. These rankings and scores are computed from public installation records and published customer reviews. No installer can pay for placement, and no installer — including those we work with — can pay to change a score.