Best solar companies California San Bernardino County Chino
Verified Chino installs, review-backed Solar.com Scores, and the broader county market in one place. Public data, not paid placement.
What this data covers: counts come from investor-owned-utility interconnection records for Chino service addresses. Homes served by municipal utilities interconnect through their city utility instead and do not appear here. Companies with fewer than 10 recorded local installs are not listed; many also build across San Bernardino County and beyond. See the full San Bernardino County ranking →
| # | Installer | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Orange County Contracting Services6 recent installs16 verifiedActive since 20210.0% leased | 6 | 16 | 2021 | 0.0% | 8.4 | Get a direct bid | |
| 2 | Electricare0 recent installs13 verifiedActive since 20100.0% leased | 0 | 13 | 2010 | 0.0% | 8.4 | Get a direct bid | |
| 3 | Blalock Electric1 recent installs15 verifiedActive since 202220.0% leased | 1 | 15 | 2022 | 20.0% | 8.4 | Get a direct bid | |
| 4 | Evolution Energy0 recent installs11 verifiedActive since 20150.0% leased | 0 | 11 | 2015 | 0.0% | 8.4 | Get a direct bid | |
| 5 | Solar Optimum Design & Electrical5 recent installs37 verifiedActive since 20180.0% leased | 5 | 37 | 2018 | 0.0% | 8.2 | Get a direct bid | |
| 6 | Powur Home Construction3 recent installs35 verifiedActive since 20222.9% leased | 3 | 35 | 2022 | 2.9% | 8.0 | Get a direct bid | |
| 7 | Pell Solar0 recent installs24 verifiedActive since 201145.8% leased | 0 | 24 | 2011 | 45.8% | 7.9 | Get a direct bid | |
| 8 | Grid Alternatives1 recent installs12 verifiedActive since 201266.7% leased | 1 | 12 | 2012 | 66.7% | 7.8 | Get a direct bid | |
| 9 | La Solar Group1 recent installs25 verifiedActive since 201440.0% leased | 1 | 25 | 2014 | 40.0% | 7.6 | Get a direct bid | |
| 10 | Current Home6 recent installs38 verifiedActive since 2021100.0% leased | 6 | 38 | 2021 | 100.0% | 7.6 | Get a direct bid | |
| 11 | True Power Solar3 recent installs55 verifiedActive since 201223.6% leased | 3 | 55 | 2012 | 23.6% | 7.5 | Get a direct bid | |
| 12 | Sunlux0 recent installs28 verifiedActive since 201821.4% leased | 0 | 28 | 2018 | 21.4% | 7.5 | Get a direct bid | |
| 13 | Semper Solaris2 recent installs60 verifiedActive since 20150.0% leased | 2 | 60 | 2015 | 0.0% | 7.4 | Get a direct bid | |
| 14 | Nexus Energy Systems0 recent installs23 verifiedActive since 201413.0% leased | 0 | 23 | 2014 | 13.0% | 7.3 | Get a direct bid | |
| 15 | Lgcy Installation Services43 recent installs53 verifiedActive since 202333.9% leased | 43 | 53 | 2023 | 33.9% | 7.2 | Get a direct bid | |
| 16 | Southwest Sun Solar1 recent installs17 verifiedActive since 201782.3% leased | 1 | 17 | 2017 | 82.3% | 7.1 | Get a direct bid | |
| 17 | Sun Solar Energy Solutions0 recent installs15 verifiedActive since 201813.3% leased | 0 | 15 | 2018 | 13.3% | 7.1 | Get a direct bid | |
| 18 | SolarMax Renewable Energy Provider18 recent installs140 verifiedActive since 201213.6% leased | 18 | 140 | 2012 | 13.6% | 6.9 | Get a direct bid | |
| 19 | Sunrun460 recent installs1,536 verifiedActive since 201465.1% leased | 460 | 1,536 | 2014 | 65.1% | 6.9 | Get a direct bid | |
| 20 | Lift Energy Construction0 recent installs21 verifiedActive since 202133.3% leased | 0 | 21 | 2021 | 33.3% | 6.9 | Get a direct bid |
Solar.com Scores are live for 44 of the 69 listed companies. Companies marked “Not yet scored” have fewer than 20 analyzed review texts or are still being analyzed; scores appear as each company's full review record is processed. Select up to 4 companies to compare them category by category.
% leased counts systems recorded as third party owned, meaning a lease or power purchase agreement. The remainder are customer owned. Active installer counts include every company that filed an interconnection that year, down to small and occasional operations. Counts come from PG&E, SCE, and SDG&E interconnection records; homes served by municipal utilities like LADWP, SMUD, and city power departments interconnect through their local utility instead, so companies focused on those territories show fewer records here. The Solar.com Score is computed from the full text of each company's published customer reviews (star ratings and review counts sourced from Google and Yelp), plus verified public-record track record; it drives the default ranking for scored companies and is never for sale.
Run your address and see direct pricing for Chino in about two minutes. No sales call required.
The table ranks scored companies by Solar.com Score, computed from customer review evidence and verified track record; 44 companies in this city currently carry a score. Companies not yet scored remain visible below the scored cohort by recent Chino install activity. The best company for your home also depends on your roof, utility, and bid, which is why the same companies compete on price through solar.com.
Companies with enough review evidence are ranked by Solar.com Score. Not-yet-scored companies show a dash in the rank column and sit below them, ordered by recent 2025-26 installation activity recorded for Chino addresses in CPUC interconnection records. No company can pay for placement.
Where a company clears the 20 analyzed-review floor, its Solar.com Score summarizes substantive customer review texts, weighted by reviewer credibility and recency. Select companies in the table to compare their review scores category by category, from sales integrity to long-term support.
Run your address through solar.com. Vetted installers compete on one identical scope for your home, pricing is locked online, and the Best Price Guarantee backs the winning number in writing.
Methodology: Counts are residential PV interconnections in investor-owned-utility territory (PG&E, SCE, SDG&E) per CPUC Rule 21 public records through May 2026. Postal and name variants are merged. Municipal utility territory such as LADWP, Glendale, Pasadena, Burbank, Anaheim, and Riverside Public Utilities is not included in those CPUC counts. Counts show recorded installations, not quality ratings. Reported costs are self-reported on owned-system interconnections. No installer can pay for placement.
Who we are: Solar.com is a solar marketplace — we connect homeowners with installers and earn a fee when projects move forward. These rankings and scores are computed from public installation records and published customer reviews. No installer can pay for placement, and no installer — including those we work with — can pay to change a score.